A: Do you know this sentence?

B: Which sentence?

A: It is called: traveling all over the world without reason,

B: It is difficult to move forward if you are rational.

A: Look at that word is simple-

B: Hey! You said this wrongly.

A: What's wrong?

B: It's said it's reversed.

A: Reversed?

B: Think about it again.

A: Oh, yes, yes, it should be "it's hard to move forward if you have a rational approach."

B: "Travel all over the world without reason."

A: That's right!

B: No!

A: Is this wrong?

B: You should think about this again, think about it.

A: How should I say this?

B: It should be said: "If you have reason, you can travel all over the world, but if you don't have reason, you can't move in an instant."

A: Ah! Yes, Yes! Even though I say that, I don’t agree!

B: Why?

A: Unreasonable, unreasonable, we need to find out the truth. Can we still travel around the world if we don’t do it?

B: There is no such person.

A: Our section chief can do it.

B: Is that true?

A: Let me give you an example.

B: Tell me and listen.

A: Our department is a section chief and three secretaries.

B: Four people are in the same office.

A: The three of us planned to go out for a roast duck meal that day.

B: OK, then let’s eat it.

A: Do you give money?

B: Why should I give money?

A: This requires the public to pay.

B: Eat public funds.

A: Alas!

B: This matter is unreasonable.

A: It will be reasonable if our section chief says this.

B: Yes?

A: I said, Section Chief, everyone has no oil in their stomachs. Can we go out for a roast duck meal?

B: What did the section chief say?

A: (The department head has a strong local accent tone) "Make a report."

B: How do you eat roast duck and report it?

A: "If you have a righteous name, you will be justified."

B: It’s so dignified!

A: "Yes."

B: How do you cook the report on eating roast duck?

A: "It's easy to write, report is written like this, leader, colon!"

B: Hey, wait a moment, what is behind your "leader" just now?

A: two points, two points, colon.

B: It turns out to be a punctuation mark!

A: "In order to solve the problem of oil and water in the stomachs of the masses."

B: Ah?!

A: "Is this statement inappropriate?"

B: Oh, this is inappropriate. Haha, nonsense, this is it!

A: "Don't be anxious, there are always reasons!

B: What to do?

A: "Do you eat roast duck?"

B: Eat roast duck.

A: "Roasted duck, roast the duck to a brownish-yellow, and take a bite and squeak the oil, haha."

B: Just eat roast duck!

A: "We Chinese love roast duck."

B: What do Chinese people do? This foreigner also likes to eat roast duck.

A: "Does foreigners also love roast duck?"

B: Isn’t that true?

A: "Well, there is a problem of world peace in this roast duck."

B: The issue of world peace?

A: "This is how the report is written."

B: How to write it?

A: "Leader-leader, colon!"

B: His sentence is very familiar.

A: "In order to promote great unity for all mankind and to defend world peace, we urgently need a roast duck meal."

B: What? What does eating roast duck have to do with world peace?

A: "This duck symbolizes peace."

B: How could this duck symbolize peace?

A: "Why are you a comrade who has no political mind?"

B: Then tell me and I'll listen.

A: "Every grand festival, in the square, there are ducks flying - ah, that's a pigeon, right?"

B: Who is this!

A: "The report of eating roast duck is the hardest to beat."

B: It turns out that he has no choice!

A: Don’t be anxious, there are always reasons.

B: What should I do if I do this?

A: "Do you eat roast duck?"

B: Yes, Yes, Yes.

A: "What day is the week today?"

B: I’m confused, check the calendar!

A: When I saw it, Thursday. Oh, there is a line of small characters below.

B: What is it written?
To be continued...