In later Southeast Asia, there were also national systems similar to this type.

Although Buddhism can replace the Confucian loyalty and righteous monarch and ministers to some extent, such as the theory of reincarnation, the Arhat system, etc., which is actually similar to the suppression of "loyalty and filial piety" and the division of "level", the biggest problem of the dual system of divine power and imperial power is instability. After Qin Shihuang, there was no more ambitious emperor, and he was willing to stand by people like Buddha, Heavenly Emperor, or Heavenly Master, and others to point fingers.

Secondly, Fei Qian rejected the technocratic republic.

Fei Qian does have this possibility at the moment.

Huang Yueying and Huang Chengyan are basically the strongest supporters of the handicraft industry in Feiqian's political system. Many Feiqian's "strange ideas" are achieved bit by bit through the great craftsmen in the Huang family workshop.

From this perspective, if Fei Qian wants to go further and deeply combine the promotion hierarchy system of great craftsmen with the imperial examination, it is indeed possible that the technocratic group with "mechanical technology", "Qimen Dunjia", "Tian Arithmetic Mathematical Science" and other technocratic bureaucratic groups will be derived, replacing the aristocratic gentry system that originally inherited from "Poetry, Book, Liyi" and other books.

Even during the Zhu Xi period, it was not impossible to develop the idea of ​​"studying things and seeking knowledge" into an empirical governance system, or form the "Chinese Republic" system under the leadership of the "Regional Yuan", and produce a "school political discussion" model similar to Huang Zongxi's "Mingyi Waiwenlu" conception.

But the same is true, if the technocratic republic system is adopted, China will not go long.

Because China is too big.

The developments of different regions in China are different, and the material resources are also different. If this technocratic republic system is adopted, a very serious scissor gap between industry and agriculture will be formed, leading to serious exploitation of basic industries such as agriculture and animal husbandry. At the same time, because the technocratic inheritance system obviously cannot completely resist the selfish nature of human beings, the phenomenon of passing on one hand and keeping one hand will also quickly lead to the chaos of technological development and the loss of inheritance.

And the republic system? Just look at the cabinet in the late Ming Dynasty, you can generally understand what the effect is.

If China now ruled the world, then the republic system, or the cabinet parliamentary system similar to the Ming Dynasty, would definitely be a very good choice. The Ming Dynasty's cabinet can be regarded as a bureaucrat with the "official" technology to some extent. This kind of cabinet does not require the emperor to operate, and even if the emperor is disguised, it can continue to maintain basic political rule, for more than ten years, and even for decades.

If it weren't for the Little Ice Age and the Qing army entered the pass, Da Meng could still maintain it for more than ten or twenty years without a problem. So it is obvious that the technocratic parliamentary republic system has no problems internally, but external problems will be great. In the face of sudden crises and foreign invasions, the compromise and weakness of the petty bourgeoisie are also inevitable.
Chapter completed!