Many people are confused about this plot and feel that the logic is not working. Here we systematically analyze this setting of Zhaoling.

This single chapter mainly replies to some book friends who are interested but have doubts and cannot understand. You can read it. Those who understand or don’t care can skip it directly because the length is a bit long, 5,000 words, but it is a free word count anyway.

First, we must determine the four key basic concepts of the dream world:

1. Timeline. The dream world timeline and the real world timeline, two independent timelines.

2. Interaction. The operating rules of the two worlds are different. When the interaction between the two worlds is achieved with humans as the bond, magical things will be produced.

3. Including relationships and ultimate concept rewriting. The dream world can modify logical definitions at will (this is super important).

4. Reference system. Select a target as the reference system, and the target reference system is relatively in "present moment" or "present progressive".

(These four basic points are very important, and they cannot be explained without the above concepts)

———Separation line——

Intercept two obvious arguments.

Dispute 1: You can't see your ancestors or descendants, and you can't intercept the original text of a book friend: "I went into the fantasy world, but I'm going to die in one minute, so you can't meet someone who comes in one minute, because the timeline of the fantasy world is the same, so it's impossible to meet the problem of descendants."

Agreement 2: Time ratio 1: Infinity. Then I will only live in stand-alone forever.

———Separation line——

Regarding the first debate, I think this book friend may have made a mistake in the timeline. The timelines in the real world are the same, but the timelines in the dream world can allow multiple parallels or disorderly, and they can be done no matter what. Why ignore the ultimate concept and rewrite this supreme law? Referring to the expression of Basic Concept 3, the timelines in the dream world can be the same, but they can also be different.

OK, according to what the book friend said as the entry point, [I will die in one minute, so it is impossible to meet someone who comes in one minute] For this sentence, the same sentence is the same. Why do you ignore the ultimate concept of the dream world again? Let’s look at it from another perspective and choose “grandmother” as the reference system. Compared with “me”, “me” is a future person, because “me” was born later. Compared with the young “grandmother” and even when she was still single, “me” who was not born is a future person, can you understand it? This should not be difficult to understand (reference system, one of the four key basic points).

OK, "Grandma" has entered the dream world, and "I" has also entered the dream world. Pay attention to the reference system here. Compared with "Grandma" and "I" enter the dream world as a future person, which shows that this is something that must have happened.

Then "interaction" takes effect (interaction, one of the four key basic points). The first interaction is to interact with the two worlds with "I" as a bond. Remember, because the real world enters the dream world by accepting consciousness deception of "I", here "I" is the bond between the interaction between the two worlds, and it is the first time.

Only after completing the first interaction will the second interaction occur.

The second "interaction" is to use the "dream world" as a link to realize the interaction between the past and the future. The carrier is the communication between the present and future people, that is, the communication between the "I" as the future people and the "grandmother" as the past people.

Then the bond of the second interaction is "Dream World". At this time, under the ultimate concept of Basic Concept 3, you can make any logical modifications in the Dream World, which naturally includes the communication between current and future people through the Dream World, that is, "I" and "grandmother".

Then no matter whether this person is a current person or a future person, entering the dream world means that he belongs to a part of the dream world, that is, part of the bond, and also includes entering.

So what does it have to do with the fact that it is impossible to see someone coming in after one minute after death? What does it have to do with the different time ratio? It will not be affected at all. It is precisely because the dream world dominated by the ultimate concept can be modified at will, so there are different time ratios.

Under what circumstances can't you see the "grandmother"? Only when "I" has never entered the dream world from beginning to end, and I don't want to see my grandmother, so I won't meet. On the contrary, if my grandmother doesn't want to, you won't see him. Another type is system forced intervention, but these all need to be judged on the matter. Moreover, even if the system forced intervention is based on the premise of the first interaction, it is to enter the dream world.

———Separation line——

Regarding the second debate [Time ratio 1: Infinite. Then I will only live in a stand-alone machine forever and need a separate server.]

Why did you have this idea? Why did you ignore the supreme definition of the two fantasy worlds that include relationships and ultimate concepts?

Time ratio 1: Infinite, that is the relative relationship between "I" and the dream world. The time ratio of "him" is 1:100, which is the relationship between "him" and the dream world. "I" and "he" are both in the same dream world, so why are they living in a stand-alone game?

Some people may think of new questions. The current dream world, the future dream world, the future and the present appear in the same world at the same time. They are people in two time dimensions. They are like two parallel lines and never intersect.

This needs to be explained by the theory of relativity. The article also mentions that the theory of relativity needs to be introduced. I remember that it seems that I have explained it roughly!

It is easy to explain if we choose "grandmother" as the reference system, then "grandmother" is relatively in the present moment, and "grandmother" now has "me", and this "me" is the future person.

Then we can further deduce that with "I" as the reference system, the time point at which "I" is at is the present moment. If "I" is not a single dog and must have children in the future, then children are future people.

After clarifying this idea, it is not difficult to understand. Now let’s assume that using “I” as the reference system, “grandmother” entered the dream world when she was young and single. This is a historical event that has happened in the past, right?

So compared to "me", I entered the dream world, and I would definitely see my young grandmother in the dream world. I could go back to the scene of the historical events that my grandmother had in the past, and of course I could see her and communicate with her.

Then we can further deduce that if the reference system is transferred to the "future person", then the future person will be at a certain time X point is the present moment, and this future person is your descendant. When he comes to see you, it is the same as when you go back to see your grandmother.

So, when you say this, you should understand what this is and understand it.

And there is an important point to understand that the concept of time in the dream world is "disordered". Everyone has an independent timeline. This timeline can be the same as another person, or different, and the proportion with the timeline in the real world can be the same or different.

But one thing is the same, that is, they are all in a dream world.

Add "ultimate concept", "ultimate concept", and "ultimate concept". Three important words are said. In the dream world dominated by the ultimate concept, all logical rules can be modified at will, so that all the above events can occur.

When two people interact, a relative relationship will arise, and a series of events will occur.

So the four basic points of the beginning are the biggest benchmark for understanding these logics.

———Separation line——

The above content describes events that interact in the dream world and occur in the dream world, but we know that there is still the real world, so what is the relationship between the real world and the dream world?

In this case, what impact will the events that occur in the dream world react to the real world? Will the grandmother paradox appear? And what the hell is the concept of "alternative immortality" in the text? You have to explain it.

Take your time.

Let’s talk about the concept of “alternative immortality” first. When it comes to reality, we have to introduce the theory of relativity. In fact, we understand the above two arguments, which is easy to understand. If the “I” who is about to die in the last minute will have an alternative immortality, and the time ratio is 1: infinite and the alternative immortality is realized, then compared with the “I”, as long as we enter the dream world and complete the time ratio of the real world to the dream world, the time ratio of the real world to the dream world is 1: infinite, then it doesn’t matter whether the real world is only one minute or one second, because “I” does not plan to return to reality at all and will stay in the dream world all the time.

At the same time, this is not a stand-alone machine, because you are in the Dream World, you can communicate with future people, past people, and directly communicate with all other people in the Dream World. The premise of communication is relative interaction, and the premise of interaction is achieved through the link of the Dream World. This has been explained before, but if you don’t understand it, you can go back and take a look.

That is why it is called "alternative eternal life", which is a one-way ticket to the road to eternal life. If you only have one minute in the real world, you may die immediately when you go back.

Compared with the "you" in reality, you only have one minute, and compared with the "you" in the dream world, you are immortal.

The "you" in reality dies one minute later, and "you" is buried by your family. This event is relatively related to the reference system with your family. Compared with the "you" as the reference system, compared with the "you" who is eternal in the dream world, the "you" in the real world is always one minute before death. As long as you do not return to reality, you will never face the event of dying one minute later (knock on the blackboard: to understand this expression, the key is to make a relative distinction in the reference system).

But this does not prevent you from communicating with your family in the dream world a minute later. The principle explanation is the explanation of the "grandmother" reference system above (click on the blackboard: I don't understand it yet, then change the angle. If you treat yourself as history and your family as the present moment, then for your family, the time related to you is a historical event in the eyes of your family, so the reference system is the key point to understand this concept.).

This is what is called "alternative immortality", and it should be understood.

———Separation line——

Regarding the events that occur in the dream world, what impact will the reaction in the real world have? So will the grandmother paradox appear?

This question may be the last key question.

The carrier of interaction is the real people. Some people have the last minute in reality, but some people are young people. Will they indirectly know the future after they return to the real world because they communicate with future people?

OK, this is the key point of the problem, so let’s analyze it here.

Let's assume an event, because the "I" who is still single now meets her future son first in the dream world (the real world is still single).

OK, we set a script of such an incident that will happen. "I" communicate with my son and learn at a certain point in the future. Because some relationships with my wife implicate "I" and put "I" in jail, and I will be sentenced to death for life and even in the future. Then I will pick the most serious death penalty, which means I know that I will be shot on X, X, X, X, and X in the future.

"I" know that my future self will face this tragic fate. Then "I" don't want to die, so I decided to be single for the rest of my life and not marry a wife, so wouldn't I avoid being shot? But the problem is, in this way, it will be impossible for a son to appear. So how can I know the future without a son? How can this happen? The cause and effect of the entire incident cannot be established.

Isn’t this the classic “grandmother paradox”?

OK, the problem is very clear now.

This question was explained in detail in the main article section through the reporter's questioning session, and was explained by parallel cosmology, observer effect, etc. I remember that the article also used closed-loop roller coaster tracks to express it.

In other words, the road ahead is destined, just like a roller coaster track. If you change, it means derailment. The roller coaster cannot walk through smoothly, and may be overturned directly. Only by following the correct track can you walk through smoothly, as if it is destined in the dark.

Let’s use the above shooting incident to make an inappropriate new assumption. If the “I” knew about the future incident, “I” initially tried every means to be single for the rest of my life to avoid the fate of being shot. But until one day I saw that she and confirmed her eyes, I fell into a desolation from now on. Even if I was shot, I would have to be together again. I can’t say it’s right?

So from this new hypothetical event, even until the future is a corner of the future. The key is that any small variable may bring you back to the original track, because only in this way can you not derail, continue to move forward, and have a future.

Okay, those who can see this must be interested in science and will finish reading it carefully and see it here, otherwise it would be impossible for such boring content to be read as follows.

Friends with quick thinking may find it very long-winded, but a little long-winded can make friends with slightly poor understanding understand.

In fact, Zhao Ling wants to express that the charm of science lies in this, just like everything mentioned above, such as alternative immortality, including uploading consciousness, parallel universes, etc., they have not been proven to exist, nor have they been proven to not exist, so they cannot make a direct judgment as soon as they come up, unless you can prove that it exists or prove that it does not exist.

The true meaning of science is to find the truth, even if it cannot be found, it must explore its laws.

The human scientific system has repeatedly subverted the original concepts and discovered new truths, and thus continuously improved the scientific system. It is only perfect, not complete, because many things cannot be explained so far, but they should not be denied just because they cannot be explained. Instead, it is beneficial to show that the existing scientific system is incomplete, and inability to explain it also means new discoveries.

We now think that electromagnetic waves and electromagnetic fields are justified. But in that era, electricity, magnetism, fields, etc. were all irrelevant physical quantities. Now we all know that they are related and closely related.

For example, in the past, few people dared to oppose Newton's Law because of his authority. Until the emergence of Einstein, it subverted the worldview of people in that era, and the theory of relativity became one of the two cornerstones of modern physics.

Einstein's great expenditure lies in his courage to subvert authority. At the same time, the theory of relativity was almost completed by himself. Quantum theory was promoted by a large number of great people, such as Planck at the beginning, Einstein himself, Schrödinger, Boer, Heisenberg, etc., and a lot of other great people, all of which were big shots. You see, Einstein is also in it, and the quantum of light was proposed by Einstein.

Interestingly, two scientists, Einstein and Boer, had a fight in quantum mechanics for life. Einstein could not accept it until his death in 1955. When Boer died in 1962, people found that the formula written on a blackboard in his house showed that they were trying to convince Einstein. It is estimated that Boer's biggest regret is that he failed to convince Einstein.

But no matter what, now we know that in this argument, Einstein, Schrödinger and his party were wrong, and Boer and the Copenhagen school he represented were correct.

Quantum entanglement is like that, it is not recognized, but it has a function of over-distance. You can't explain it, too, because the experimental results prove that it is like that. We all know that any theory must stand the test of experiments, and the experimental results can deduce the theory.

Therefore, scientific progress often subverts the old world outlook, reshapes, and then establishes a new and more complete scientific system. The result is the progress of civilization and technological progress.

This is also the charm of science. The process of scientific research is a process of seeking truth.

Zhao Ling spent so much time writing such a single chapter, hoping to find friends who love science together. Compared to falling in love with science and falling in love with science, will the energy of entertainment be more meaningful at this level? What do you think?

Of course, if you want to return to the ultimate problem of online literature, you don’t have to be serious about online literature. If you are serious, 99% of online literature can’t stand scrutiny, but Zhao Ling does not object to scrutiny. He is serious, but hopes to be tolerant, and existence is reasonable.

above.
Chapter completed!