"Why are you laughing?"

Kobe is like a vicious dog. Wei Xia has not forgotten that he is also a rookie. If Kobe is unhappy and sends him to a supermarket 30 kilometers away to buy water, then he can't tell him another kind lie - run to a place 30 meters away and wait for an hour, then take the water back to find Kobe with his acting skills that make the referee believe in. He will definitely be able to hide it.

"It's nothing, I just think Vaughan is too ignorant." In order not to end up like Weaver, even the master has to speak against his conscience.

"Hmph, this is your first sentence today." Kobe was no longer angry with Wei Xia. It seemed that he was not as stingy as flashing through the open. It was really surprising.

Wei Xia originally wanted to ask Kobe for some idea to coax his girlfriend, but he suddenly felt that his relationship with Selinda Swan still had a chance to save.

But he heard from his teammates around him that Kobe would give him a diamond ring every time he made Vanessa angry, and he would give him a style worth millions of dollars every time.

Although he can afford it, his savings are not rich enough to buy such luxury goods at will in exchange for women's hearts.

And, it's not his fault.

What was wrong with him? It was hard to make sense to devote himself to art, no matter where he put it. Just like when he was a child, when he watched Marion Cotillard take off in "Fate Express", he naturally blushed and breathed unevenly. He once had the idea of ​​marrying her home. After growing up, he suddenly woke up one day: Why should I marry a woman who was seen naked by the whole world?

So his thoughts were cut off.

Looking back, his biggest mistake was to estimate his charm, but the truth was correct.

In terms of flat chests, is Cotillard's nude scene necessary in "Fate Express"? What other reasons are there to be filming except to stimulate the nerves of male audiences? In the end, there is nothing else to do except prove that the French goddess who is not considered a French goddess.

He had the same idea about Swan.

Seeing that Kobe's suggestion would be unreliable, Wei Xia did not ask, but instead talked about MVP.

Although Kobe averaged 35 points per game, Jordan had the highest scorer after 1988. However, he did not get recognition from the outside world.

Faced with this option, the media's usual thinking logic is the various elements that match players with MVP, such as personal performance, leadership, etc. Once the question is Kobe's turn, many media and critics think of the first thing they first become: what aspects does he not deserve to do MVP? For example, has he become selfless, has the Lakers' record top, and are teammates better because of Kobe's existence?

This kind of reverse thinking is undoubtedly unfair, just like the assumption that the suspect is guilty before the court sentence.

But there is no way. For many years, Kobe has been interpreted by public opinion on the position of an anti-MVP player.

In addition, among the five annual awards including the Most Valuable Player, Best Defensive Player, Sixth Person, Fastest Progressive Player, Best Rookie, MVP's selection criteria most claim to abandon data and emphasize other aspects. So you must accept the fact that a "thug" who averages 35.4 points per game and 81 points per game can only condescend the fact that MVP votes for fourth place.

Since the birth of MVP, the standards of the alliance have never been fixed.

In the 1955-56 season, the first player to win the MVP in history was Hawks Bob Pettit. As the league's scoring champion, he averaged the second most rebounds in the league (16). However, his team-leading score was only 33 wins, which was even more eye-catching than Westbrook in 2017. He averaged a triple-double per game half a century later, with 47 wins. Is it just the first in history? The league's standards have been slowly adjusted? It's understandable.

From Pettit, we can see that the first MVP standard in history is to commend players with the best data and the most eye-catching personal abilities.

The next year, in 1957? The judges found that their choice was a bit stupid, so they gave the MVP to Bob Cousy, "Hunidi on Hardwood". It is worth mentioning that? The MVP vote that year? The top five were all white, and the sixth-ranked black man, Maurice Stokes (maurice    sf/pf/c), known as the Magician of the 1950s. After three years of data from 16156, he suffered a serious head injury in a game with the Lakers. It caused paralysis.

In 1958? MVP was given to Russell, and the selection criteria became the "best player in the best team" that modern fans can generally accept.

However, a few years later, the monster who claimed to have played over 20,000 women entered the league, with a persuasive average of 3,727 per game? and promoted the team from the third to the second to the second. It seems that his election is well deserved. Not to mention that his team lost 10 more games than the Celtics? Just say that he improved the team's record. There were only eight teams in the league in 1960, that is to say, he brought a team ranked fifth last season to the second place. Looking at it, isn't it that exciting? But? His data is too shocking? And even if it's just three rankings, it's a real improvement.

The mvp standard has changed again at this point.

It is still a new change that modern fans are willing to accept: it has made the team a huge improvement compared to last season.

Of course, this is only in the data. According to some reports, Lao Zhang turned all players in the Philadelphia Warriors except Paul Alikin into a waste that would only pass him in the halftime, but the Warriors' improvement is real. The regular season has significantly improved and fell into the playoffs. The monsters fighting alone can only fight the trapped beasts when facing the Celtic dynasty at its peak.

After that, how to make teammates better? Like "chemical reaction", it has gradually become a word used to measure players' value. The so-called "data madman" and "individual hero" were abandoned by experts. So we can see that Bill Russell, who has a rather ugly data, successfully achieved the MVP three consecutive banker (1961, 62, 63), because he made each teammate feel like he won; when Chamberlain was the MVP three consecutive round (1966, 67, 68), it was no longer because of the shocking score, but because he found a way to play the No. 5 position like a guard (average 8.6 assists per game).

From 1956 to 1980, the 25 years from the voting by players, 23 MVP trophys except Cousey and Oscar Robertson were awarded to the center. Yes, the great center is the object that all peers admire and are willing to partner with. Because of his existence, you can get a lot of open opportunities. You don’t care about losing your opponent. You just stuff the ball into the inside to win... Teammates and coaches do love such a guy to death. Even in the 21st century, when you randomly interview an active player and ask "who is the greatest player in the league", the answer still cannot escape "Shake" and "Duncan". Only when the question becomes "You are happy to spend money to see who plays the ball", will you hear "Bobe".

After 1981, the judges of MVP were changed from players to journalists, and the aesthetic standards were upside down. Dr. J was first rehabilitated. Under the clamor of the media, a mvp flower bloomed and a hundred schools of thought began.

Since then, Big Bird, Magician, and Jordan have joined forces to monopolize the MVP for the next nine years. Iverson's 2001 MVP is the most inspiring one in history. The 2005 Nash, which followed, deserves it because of its legendary nature in the background.

However, the inherent disadvantages of No. 2 and No. 3 players in the MVP selection have not been eliminated - in terms of role assignment, it is difficult for them to become the core of the team's defense and it is difficult to play assist data that proves that "makes teammates better". The higher the individual score, the more likely they are to be labeled as "independent" and "unteam".

It is precisely this embarrassment that in the past 50 years, only the NBA has born Dr. O, Jordan, Iverson, and MVP.

What Kobe is going to challenge now is this embarrassment.

If Wei Xia is asked to answer those questions.

Did Kobe make his teammates better?

Answer: At least make him better.

Did Kobe bring good chemistry?

Answer: The eyes are fine and not biased. Everyone should know how good the Lakers were when Chris Mim was injured.

Do you think Kobe is an MVP?

Answer: If even James ranks second in MVP simulation prediction for many consecutive periods, why not?

Unfortunately, he has no say in this matter.

Kobe has the same pressure as Jordan back then. He has to face countless doubts and booings. Only by walking the road to the end will those who underestimate him put aside their prejudices.

"I don't care," Kobe's tone was relaxed, his trembling lips and fierce eyes exposed, "I don't care at all."

"Cool." Wei Xia had seen through his thoughts, "Be proud of you."
Chapter completed!