27, chapter twenty seven(2/2)
It's late to update today!
Get up at 7 o'clock in the morning to prepare to write! Then refresh the comments routinely to see if you have any haha! As a result, I saw another comment saying, "I didn't read the text, but I think a copywriting joke is blabla. I'm not saying you copied it, or blabla, it's best to change it." This kind of thing has not appeared for the first time, and it corresponds to style/personality/copywriting, etc.
The name of this article comes from Yanger's documentary "The Great Man" series. I watched it when I was famous for my medical career several years ago. I thought the ancient miracle doctors in it were super awesome! I felt that the name of this article was very popular. I searched on Baidu and found various documentary TV series novels and popular science posts. Last month, I suddenly wanted to write the male protagonist's illusion, so that the little cutie who doesn't like to watch genuine versions will lose her direction in Baidu.
As for copywriting, it is not just an ordinary and genuine joke. The above is Xiao Lu's "do not learn Chinese medicine", and the following is Xiao Lu's saying "need to condition" (common vocabulary used in traditional Chinese medicine). By the way, Xiao Lu's obsession characteristics are reflected. I don't know what the joke needs to be corrected.
If you want to say that following the trend may be more reliable. After all, writing articles by hand because you like to read a subject is the initial motivation for many authors to write articles. But if you grasp one or two elements, the author has read not one or two articles. Is it necessary to memorize all the same type of articles and analyze in my mind before writing every detail, "I can't write this article" and "I haven't written this article B, I can write it"? Does the author have such high requirements for the author's memory?
Since we are following the author to make changes, and then put out the original text comparison or plot logic chain comparison, we will prove that a certain meme is unique and precious, only a certain article can be used. Is it not good to make the author correct it with reasonable evidence?
It's so cute to say that it's a joke that makes the author correct it. Some people really think that "I'm not saying you're plagiarizing" is a kind sentence structure? After saying this, you have to say "The author is so sensitive". It's really interesting. Does anyone usually run to the main road and pull someone and say "I'm not saying you're stupid/pussy, I just think you're really stupid", and think you're very friendly, and are you giving a kind reminder to the other party?
I was so angry that I couldn't write an update, so I calmed down in the afternoon and thought about it. Isn't this stupid? I'm not writing awesome articles that created the genre. The positioning is to make everyone happy every day. I'm so angry about life that I don't read the article at all. Don't you have to make some money? So, I dutifully updated it! Humble.jpg
There is another update today!
Please ask for nutrient solution!twt
As a full-time author who has no talent and no creativity, he can only rely on explosive growth to support his family by begging online.
Chapter completed!