"Still and Emotion" produced by Gaomen Pictures, a subsidiary of Daenerys Entertainment, shines at the Golden Globe Awards before, and this time it continues to win 8 nominations for the Oscars, including Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actress, and Best Supporting Actress.

This is one more than in the original time and space.

Just happened to be the best director.

As for why Ang Lee was not nominated, the reason is obvious. Daenerys Entertainment is now fully capable of easily breaking this prejudice.

It is reasonable to be shortlisted for "Brave Heart" and "The Unforgettable Dream of the Covered Bridge".

However, there is obvious controversy in "The Legend of Nixon".

The biographical film directed by Oliver Stone can only be said to be the director's normal performance, both in box office and reputation. The reason why he was nominated was because Oscars were divided into pork and Oliver Stone's own status. On the other hand, there is also the result of Vivendi, the strong push behind Disney. The French want to show their presence in Hollywood.

It just so happened that several films under Daenerys Entertainment, such as "Apollo 13", "Beauty and the Beast", "This Man from Earth", and other films that are expected to be nominated, have voluntarily given up their declarations, and the average quality "The Legend of Nixon" has got the opportunity.

This is why Simon insists that the just-passed 1995 is not the Oscar New Year at all.

It really can't count.

Although Daenerys Entertainment is not a super battle, films such as "Sense and Emotion", "Death-in-Language", "Apollo 13", "Beauty and the Beast" have also won 22 nominations, due to the shortlist of "The Legend of Nixon", the announcement of this nomination inevitably attracted doubts.

The Oscar Organizing Committee is also helpless about this.

Daenerys Entertainment almost dominated the top ten annual box office list last year, and other competitors were not strong enough, so there was nothing we could do about it.

It is impossible for Oscars to do this.

After all, everyone is in this circle and can't completely avoid giving other film companies a way out.

What's more, the year the Oscars is not controversial?

Moreover, most people's attention was quickly attracted by "Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice".

The box office week around the Oscar nomination, coupled with the release party launching the second wave of publicity offensive, from January 26 to February 1, in the sixth week of release, the single-week decline of "Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice" narrowed to 17%, earning $31.54 million. The cumulative box office of this DC superhero blockbuster not only hit a new high, but also broke through another key threshold to reach $504.15 million.

This is also the reason why the two companies launched another wave of publicity and promotion offensives.

Now, the local box office of "Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice" is no longer a problem. Daenerys and Warner Bros.'s goal is directly aimed at a further local 700 million mark.

According to the current box office curve of normal commercial films, the single-week box office volume of Super T-War is only 30 million US dollars, from 500 million to 700 million, and it seems unlikely to collect another 200 million. However, Super T-War has surpassed the scope of ordinary commercial films, and this is a phenomenal blockbuster.

The box office curve of phenomenal movies has never been normal.

What's more, if you go further, such as "Back to the Future" and "Ghostbusters", which won the annual box office championship that year, both of the local box offices exceeded the $200 million threshold, while the first week of these two films was only $18.43 million and $23.16 million respectively.
Chapter completed!