"The Chinese feminist qq group leader complains...who will sue that?"

"A reputation infringement case? It's not like that. Nowadays, a QQ group owner online can still sue others for reputation infringement? Since the identity of 'QQ group owner' is mentioned in the case, the reason for the prosecution must be related to her behavior when performing the duties of the group leader?"

Feng Jianxiong successfully caught the attention of nearly 200 reporters on the court with just one opening remark.

Most reporters, including Quan Zufang, took the initiative to think like above.

Of course, there are also some famous journalists who are self-proclaimed and experienced, and they think disdainfully:

"Maybe it's just a troll who is yelling at the Internet. After the impact is huge, he will expose the other party and then prosecut the reputation infringement offline? Is this kind of trash that dares to say, "has it caused deep thoughts on the underlying logic of the free Internet economy model?" Is Feng Jianxiong too shameless?"

Fortunately, no one side has much time to make up for it.

Feng Jianxiong only let their appetites be irritated for more than ten seconds, so he took the initiative to solve the answer.

"This case is roughly like this: there is an organization called 'Chinese Feminist', which has organized dozens of groups on QQ, all of which are full-time senior groups. So, so far, its total number of members is as many as tens of thousands. As for the total identity of the group leader, I will not expose it. It would be better to call Ms. A from Hujiang as a specialist.

The main purpose of these groups organized by Ms. a is to contact fellows, so that netizens with independent and self-reliant ideas can have a channel for mutual communication and communication in resources..."

Feng Jianxiong said this and paused for two seconds for everyone to digest, in order to make the subsequent burden more dramatic.

The female reporters looked at each other, feeling that nothing new so far.

This kind of group that provides psychological encouragement for women seems to be very positive.

"However, everyone knows that being a feminist is always easy to be attacked by other anti-feminist people. I don't mean to generalize. In fact, I also know that those who work hard to fight feminist rights online are mainly some poor and ugly losers among men. They think that the existence of feminist rights has increased the general status of women in the marriage and dating market, and has increased the difficulty of finding women.

Of course, I am not saying that all anti-feminist people are like this. I do not take any position on this issue, nor do I discuss whether the feminist proponents in this case are correct. If you think it is inappropriate, you can cut this sentence off."

"At the end of this, I believe everyone thinks this must be a common dispute between two groups of people on the Internet. But the case later turned around.

An anti-feminist organization who opposed Ms. A - we also hid his real name and referred to Ms. B - after following up on Ms. A's offline activities, we discovered a gray industrial chain where Ms. A used Q group resources to monetize.

That is, Ms. a spreads extreme feminist ideas in Q groups such as "Chinese Feminism", gathers the attention and popularity of women who have been emotionally injured or think that "Chinese men don't have a good thing" for other reasons, and then takes the opportunity to run an intermediary business. Well, it is roughly equivalent to Japanese people's "no information case"-

Ms. a organized contact with a large number of foreign men in Shanghai, mainly whites and blacks, and then charged them with agency fees. Then she posted messages to female group members in various Q groups, saying, "For girls who want to experience foreign affair, I can provide opportunities to introduce friends." Then, the two parties started dating on a large scale.

After intercepting the truth about this "in-house-in-law" intermediary business, the b man actually made a big fuss online and insulted Ms. A and her organization as the "new era Internet old-brambledon" and sent Chinese girls to the foreigners' big eagle to humiliate.

Ms. A repeatedly warned Ms. B and her publicity organization to clarify and declare her own commercial nature, Ms. B was still unwilling to give up and spread false remarks on a large scale online. It is said that the organizer represented by Ms. A was responsible for foreigners to call the group of girls in Hujiang nightclubs "easy-girl"!

For this reason, Ms. A filed a counterclaim against Mr. B’s reputation infringement when she could no longer bear it——”

Feng Jianxiong said this and his voice came to an abrupt end.

He knew that journalists needed time to turn their minds.

"Damn! This... what logic is this? That woman did organize the organization to sell Yin. Although that man was a loser, the words that accused her were all facts. How could this be called 'reputation infringement'?"

Because today is an Internet forum, many of the reporters who come here are not from the rule of law. It is normal not to know this kind of thing.

Even a few female reporters like Quan Zufang who are more knowledgeable about the law just think: "Even if you want to sue, this case can only be related to 'privacy rights'? It's a man who is b and Ms. A's offline identity and tracked and investigated her offline behavior. But the matter is all 'real people and real things', how can it be called 'infringement of reputation rights'?"

Anyone who understands the law knows that fabricating false statements infringe on others’ reputations is called “infringement of reputation rights.”

If you just disclose some disgraceful things, but as long as the matter itself is a "real person and real thing", it will definitely have nothing to do with reputation rights, and at most it will infringe on the "privacy rights".

For example, if a paparazzi uploaded photos of Brother Guan Xi, Gillian and Cecilia Cheung online, it would be a complete "invasion of privacy rights". After all, the picture is not from someone else's Ps, but real guns and live ammunition.

"Mr. Feng, is the case you just described... wrong? Are you sure it is a 'right to reputation' case?"

Based on the thoughts just now, Quan Zufang asked this question on behalf of the small group of journalists who understand the law.

"No, you heard it right, it's the right to reputation." Feng Jianxiong's answer was as firm as ever.

"The key to this case is that you haven't gotten it. The attack on Ms. A was said to have become an "Internet Bullshit" and organized an illegal online sales activity.

But Ms. A has repeatedly stated that she has not given any financial benefits to the female group members who were on the bed. Even these spontaneous interactions are different from the common "****" in our neighboring country, because those women do not accept money or treat them directly from foreign men. Perhaps the room rate when both parties are paid by foreign men, but this does not constitute a money-sex transaction, because the registrant of the hotel accommodation is the man. The woman did not spend the night in the room, but it is just a temporary "visitor".

Therefore, based on all the above legal evidence requirements, we can conclude that the characterization of Ms. B's behavior insulted Ms. A's behavior from beginning to end has nothing to do with the organization's selling Yin. The woman voluntarily did not sleep for nothing. How could she sell it?

Although Ms. a received money herself, since she did not transfer it to the woman in sex-love, it cannot be classified as a female vote, but can only be classified as an ‘intermediary fee’.

Moreover, Ms. a has also stated that she has spent a lot of time and energy on providing intermediary services to both parties, so this intermediary fee is only "labor income". Just as the matchmaking website "Century Jiayuan" also charges intermediary fees, and there are also people on it who know that they are fighting each other, but the website still charges an introduction fee?

The reason why she did not pay the woman was because she was a firm feminist. She could not tolerate using money to insult the personality of a free sex-loving lady. People should make money gloriously based on their own labor, but they should not exchange money for betrayal of a sexual right that both parties can obtain pleasure. In sex, she believes that men and women are equal, and if the woman collects money, it will be denied that the woman herself is happy.

In this case, Mr. B said that she organized the sale of Yin, which was not an infringement of reputation rights!”

Feng Jianxiong's last words were truly resounding.

The two biggest legal contradictions in this case were explained suddenly:

First of all, regarding Ms. A’s collection of money, since "Jiayuan" also legally collects money, why can’t the QQ group owner who aims to have sex with the opposite sex to collect money?

Secondly, about Ms. A's not giving money to the girl involved - this is to respect the woman, okay! If you give money, it will insult you!

"So, a friend of mine accepted the commission and helped the parties win the lawsuit, demonstrating the justice and strictness of the law!"

Feng Jianxiong took advantage of the shock of the female reporters and waved his hand firmly.

Then, he changed his mind.

"However, this case also gave me a lot of deep thought. I summarized a sentence, not knowing whether it should be said or not."

Of course that's what to say.

All the reporters did not support the actors, but listened quietly and quietly.

"When you think a service is free, it may be just because you are treated as a commodity - pay attention to my wording, don't misinterpret it, and don't take my meaning a step further. I am a lawyer and the champion of the international college debate. You should know that I will not make low-level mistakes.

What I said is, ‘It may be just because you are regarded as a commodity’, not ‘you are a commodity’. This is just someone else’s subjective belief, and it does not represent your objective existence, nor does it represent your own subjective mentality.

Specifically in the case just now, I sincerely believe that those girls who pursue freedom are positive."

Silence, terrifying silence.

When you think a service is free, it may be just because you are also regarded as a product!!!

This sentence later became the trend of public opinion and famous sayings and golden sentences at the West Lake Sword Contest that day.

With the previous case as a prelude, all reporters felt that this sentence was originally obscure and difficult to immerse itself in a sense of immersion, becoming so intimate and so overwhelming that it made people breathless, as if they were part of this fate.

"Hiss... Xiaoxiong is worthy of being a master who incites people's hearts. He was like telling jokes, and he was chatting and laughing lightly. Suddenly, like Chopin's piano music, a cannon broke out from the flowers." Quan Zufang couldn't help but be shocked by the atmosphere and aura in the field.

All that was left was the worship of Feng Jianxiong's eloquence.

And this is obviously not finished.

Feng Jianxiong didn't reach orgasm at all.

"When we look at a more universal level, the product is not necessarily the 'body' mentioned in this example. It can be our privacy, or the pleasure and dopamine secretion brought to others by our attention and likes.

Not everything here is bad, it is a zero-sum game-like exchange of one's rise and the other's decline - we should admit that in the current free Internet economy, most of the exchange resources used for "free" are win-win. Just like a free sex game, men have a chicken and women have a pussy. After they interact with each other, none of them lack a piece of meat, but they gain the beauty and pleasure created out of thin air.

However, we have to admit that not all transactions are so beautiful. This kind of win-win space is easily divided by giants. For example, I believe that most of the business that wins through interactions is currently under the control of Tengyun. This is the inevitability of capital sense.

So, if our society continues to promote the infinite expansion of the free economy, can the exchange resources we find next time still be guaranteed to be a win-win situation?

When you read a novel for free, what you pay may be "big data for personal Internet behavior habits". The data can be copied infinitely, and you have not lost a piece of meat.

When you play a free online game, what you pay may be "Dopamine that makes RMB players happy after being killed by RMB players," you may have to weigh it.

When you finally watch all the consultations and interesting short videos on Ins for free, what you pay for may be that your political tendencies are analyzed by the campaign consulting company, and then push them to you, "Your enemy, who you hate, who is actually supporting X candidates, so you should support T candidates."

Everyone says that the free economy is a business where "the wool comes from the pig, and then the monkey pays the bill, and finally forces the dog to death". It seems that the sheep will suffer no losses.

But those big guys won't tell you that the sheep actually paid some other things in this transaction. It's just that these things have not been defined as exchange value at present, and the sheep cannot be sold directly.

But these things will one day be defined as value and can be sold - just like when air pollution is not serious enough, there is no market for air purifiers and fresh air cannot be sold, and the additional profits obtained by pollutants by excessive pollution discharge do not seem to harm anyone.

However, once air pollution reaches a certain level, people need to pay for purifiers and fresh air. People will also know that polluting companies should pay the "carbon emission transaction price" for additional pollution exceeding the average emissions. Today, the reason why we feel that we have not paid anything on the Internet for free is that the pollutants such as data are not strong enough, so we praise the large chimneys emitting black smoke as symbols of industrialization, just like the British in the early 18th century.
Chapter completed!