"Now, anybody can afford a private car. Who is showing off because of the car at home? To be honest, if you want to show off your own wealth, you must at least buy a Mercedes-Benz BMW. The opponent's debater kept saying that buying a private car mainly satisfies social needs. Isn't it too dark inside? This is to judge a gentleman's ambition by the heart of a villain!" Yang Weiwei responded and argued against each other.

Feng Jianxiong: "Defensive social needs are also social needs. Selling Mercedes-Benz and BMW is enough to show off what others don't have, but buying an Alto BYD can at least prove that 'I can afford something that everyone can afford'.

Otherwise, if it is purely for practical value, with the congestion in first-tier cities such as Hujiang and Jingcheng and even foreign megacities, driving in the city is not as cost-effective as subways and other public transportation."

Yang Weiwei: "This statement is purely reasoning and does not have real evidence. Then let me ask you again, how much labor has the automobile industry supported and how much GDP has been manufactured? Do the other debaters know?"

Feng Jianxiong shrugged: "I don't need to know, this has nothing to do with today's debate topic."

Yang Weiwei's face changed: "Why doesn't it matter? Today, China's automobile industry alone has supported tens of millions of industrial chain labor and created trillions of GDP. Even as the opponent's debater said just now, buying a car is not only convenient, but also social comparison needs.

If the government does not limit the number of private cars thresholds and only allows the market to use congestion and pollution discharge fees and other means to force those who are not very eager to drive, "buy less after buying, and park at home normally unless it is absolutely necessary," that is not better than not allowing people to buy it? At least in this way, the government can still sell so many cars, driving the industrial chain and asset stock. It is also a huge help to promote employment!"

Feng Jianxiong: "First of all, the other party's debater called waste of resources and overproduction "pull the economy". Then you'd better return to the era of extensive economy and never talk about industrial upgrading and backward production capacity elimination!

Secondly, we say that even if the government limits the number of private cars, it is currently restricted by division and segments. For example, the current policy of restricting license plates in Beijing and Hujiang is only restricting local residents from registering license plates locally and using the roads locally on a daily basis.

If residents want to buy a car and put it there for social purposes, they can still buy it, but they need to go to the gang room or Susu and Xiuzhou license plates, and they can't drive into the city normally. But this does not prevent them from occasionally driving into Beijing and Shanghai as foreign cars, nor does it prevent them from taking photos of the car in their own garage to share QQ space.

As for the performance effect of being shot is not a local license plate, the auction effect is reduced - this is not a problem at all, because the license plate is expensive, and people with local license plates can better show off their wealth invisibly, which is easier to distinguish the level of showing off their wealth than when there was no such threshold before!”

...

The final stage of the free debate almost became a fierce competition between Feng Jianxiong and Yang Weiwei. Other teammates on both sides gradually began to fail to keep up with their ideas.

Yang Weiwei used up her last tricks, but she failed to nail the positive side to any ideologically incorrect political label such as "destroying the free choices of the people and aggravating social injustice."

She felt dry mouth and weak.

Even the killer moves that were originally planned to be kept for the summary of the poem were completely used up in advance.

Finally, there are 3 minutes of summary statements each.

Yu Meiqin vs. Yang Weiwei, who was exhausted in advance.

Yang Weiwei's strength was originally just inferior to Feng Jianxiong, but it should be slightly better than that of Yu Meiqin, the second-ranked player of Jinling Normal University.

However, Yang Weiwei, who was squeezed out, was almost as capable as Yu Meiqin.

In addition, she spent too much energy and failed to turn the tables in the last three minutes.

Neither side again raised their intentions in the summary statements, but basically just a solid summary.

"It seems that the positive side should have won. The key is that the positive side has studied the specific administrative methods and methods of "how to limit cars" too thoroughly. The negative side wants to rely on ideological attacks to discredit, but there is basically no chance." Professor Zhang from Peking University and Professor Jiang from Fudan, among the judges, both thought about this.

"The attack is very specific and detailed, with the style of parliamentary debate. If Feng Jianxiong from Jinling Normal University is willing to go to politics and goes abroad to do politics, his future will probably be great. However, China does not need to accept parliamentary inquiries, so this skill will be wasted." This is the idea of ​​the two poets and judges Yu Qiuyu and Bei Dao.

Everyone had their own opinions, as Yang Weiwei sat down a little weakly, host Sabining finally announced:

"Now I announce that the summary statements between both parties have ended. Please rest for a while and wait for the judges of this event to ask the final questions of both parties, and then give the review results."

"Please select the questioning guests on the jury!"

"I'll do it, I know more about administrative inquiries." In the jury, Chen Wenqian, the self-proclaimed writer, volunteered to show off her qualifications, trying to convince the other four judges to ask her to ask questions.

However, she has been the Minister of Propaganda in Wanwan, and her political experience is indeed much richer than that of the other four pure scholars. She has already raised this airs so shamelessly that no one can object to her.

Chen Wenqian had long been unhappy with Feng Jianxiong. When she was in China, she happened to be a judge of Feng Jianxiong in two games, and she voted against it at that time.

The main reason is that she is a senior Muyang Dog, Cent and Brain-Destroyed Fruit Fan, otherwise she would not have been the Minister of Propaganda of the Green Camp.

When Feng saw Xiong criticizing Qiao Lao Thief, she could no longer stand the fight.

In today's game, although Feng Jianxiong was just talking about the possibility of overhauling vehicle-limiting policies, he did not say "Is it possible that the mainland government will do as well as I said when facing this practical problem?"

However, these words were so uncomfortable that they could not be said in Chen Wenqian's ears, just like Feng Jianxiong was standing up for mainland politicians, bragging about something they could not do or were not worthy of doing.

"The government that is under supervision of the free supervision of our Wanwan people can't do it, can you do it?" Chen Wenqian was thinking at this moment.

This made her look like she removed the fig leaf of mainland food, showing her sense of cultural superiority.

In the attention of the host and the audience, Chen Wenqian took the microphone and slowly asked the opposing side a question that was not painful - mainly about "If the opposing side does not support the government to limit the number of private cars in cities through administrative means, then how to specifically solve urban congestion, pollution and other problems."

This is a cliché but cannot be said to be wrong. In fact, during the debate, the positive side has attacked this point many times, and the negative side has answered it one after another.

Chen Wenqian asked this now, obviously asking about a direction that the opposing side had been fully prepared, which was purely a chance to make a statement of the opposition to systematically organize its ideas again.

The other four judges frowned slightly after hearing this, thinking that this was a free question?

Although this kind of pulling and skeleton is not obvious in form, it is simply obvious from the perspective of "feeding moves".

Yang Weiwei quickly seized this opportunity and made a statement again, taking the opportunity to organize the opposing system more smoothly.

Chen Wenqian nodded, and a trace of sharpness flashed in her eyes.

"Next, I also ask the positive side a question: You, just said in the debate, "The government can implement a policy that limits the number of private cars on the basis of absolutely meeting the two prerequisites of administration according to law and taking it from the people and using it for the people." They also emphasized the role of government planning and guidance, believing that this can replace administrative mandatory.

What I want to ask is: Do you think that government measures that are not administratively compulsory and are only leveraged effects such as planning and guidance can really solve these complex urban governance problems? As far as I know, when the Los Angeles government was planning a group of satellite city communities that could form a closed loop of work, life and consumption when planning the city.

But what is the result? At present, large-scale cross-regional commuting still exists, and urban congestion is extremely painful. Can the government really solve the problem by relying on its own predictions and guidance? If it cannot be solved, will you have to use the additional means of "not administering according to law" then?"

"Hiss..." "What is this question asking?"

The other two writers, poet judges, were either unaware of the harshness or shudder.

Professor Zhang from Peking University and Professor Jiang from Fudan thought this way: "Holding the grass, it would be too bullying to ask fresh college students this kind of problem? Is it too bullying to solve such detailed and specific urban governance administrative problems, and they can directly replace Arnold Schwarzenegger as the governor of California, why are they still studying in college!"

"As a senior politician, it's too much to use such a manipulative question to challenge college students!"

The audience did not think there was any problem, but instead thought that this question was very brainy, interesting, and mentally ill. Even among the opposing team members, three of them just looked at Chen Wenqian with joy, but did not realize how deep the artistic conception was.

At the University of Middle School, Yang Weiwei felt ashamed.

"This writer Chen is so helpful to us... Why do you feel like 'If you really win with this, you will be defeated without any force'?"

"No! How can we think so! The current situation is still obviously at a disadvantage! If we don't rely on this unexpected surprise outside the market, how could we win!"

Yang Weiwei didn't have enough brain activity for long, because Feng Jianxiong had only thought for a few seconds before he began to answer this question.

"I don't know why Ms. Chen has the idea of ​​judging a gentleman with a villain's heart.

It is very common for policies formulated in accordance with the law to achieve the intended purpose. How can we maliciously speculate that the government will break through the scope of administration according to law and use compulsory measures that infringe on civil rights without voluntarily?

What's more, in my opinion, the urban problems in Los Angeles were completely caused by the incompetent decision-making by the relevant California government back then. What they can't do does not mean that others can't do it either."

Bang! Bang! Bang!

Hurry!

Chin, dentures, eyeballs, glasses all over the floor.

Feng Jianxiong was shocked by just two opening remarks.

Who else?
Chapter completed!