The opening statements have no levels or attack points, and Gu Heren is not worried at all.

Because in his opinion, the reason why our party's opening statements were not outstanding is that the arguments the other party might stick to was too scarce, so that there was no enemy to attack the prosecution, and he could only punch the air with one punch.

If you guess a few points that the other party will likely stick to in the future, it is theoretically not impossible. But once the other party adapts to the situation and makes a quick decision to abandon these points, the positive party will easily fall into a disgraceful situation of "judging a gentleman with the heart of a villain."

Especially in the last game, when the division team was dealing with the Jinling University team, Nan Xiaoniao's opening statement took a full minute to express, "I just heard the opening statements of the opponent's debater, and I thought we had prepared the wrong topic today." Various sore Jinling University teams "randomly guessed our views" and achieved good results.

Therefore, after studying the opponent, Fudan's side was obviously afraid, for fear of being so sore by Nan Xiaoniao again, which would hurt her demeanor, so she simply gave up any "offensive defense".

Now, it depends on Nan Xiaoniao's arguments, and whether it can make people shine.

Nan Xiaoniao stood up with a graceful figure, and she tucked her blonde hair like a waterfall, and began her performance with a gentle and graceful manner:

"I believe that all the contestants and guests today know that tonight's debate topic is 'Whether humans should appropriately limit the development of the Internet in order to protect their privacy'. Therefore, the Internet is good, and I believe there is no need to elaborate on how much development and convenience it provides for human beings. Because everyone will reach this consensus tonight - the Internet is a good thing, and we should develop it, from technology, business model, social environment, and cultural atmosphere.

Similarly, the existence of privacy is also good, at least harmless to humans. This is also self-evident. Therefore, we do not intend to waste everyone's time today to prove the rationality of the existence and development of these two beautiful things. What we want to discuss is just how to make better choices when these two benefits create a conflict of running-in. And our view on this is exactly that 'humans do not have to limit the development of the Internet in order to protect privacy' - even a little bit of restrictions is unnecessary. All problems are just problems in the development process, but they should be solved by development itself..."

When Nan Xiaoniao talked about this, Gu Heren and Bai Jingyou of Fudan team did not feel any sense of crisis, but instead felt a sense of gratitude.

"It turns out that we have to adopt this kind of tactic of "two evils are the least"! Maybe the next step is to demonstrate that all the problems encountered in development can be solved through development, so there is no need to limit development" such sophistry routine!"

"Unfortunately, this trick is useless for today's competition! If the 'problem that can be solved by economic development' can be left alone, then what else should the country do for macro-control? This view, at first glance, is to win the game, and it has to account for 100% of the absolutely liberal market economy. It is natural to regulate the position that no one should interfere with by the 'market'! How can this position win the game in a country that believes in macro-control?"

The Fudan team members were thinking so.

The judges in the audience also began to look around when they heard this part, as if they wanted to understand each other's position. Although no one spoke, within just a dozen seconds, the five judges knew that Yu Qiuyu, who was showing off humanistic care, and writers like Liu Zhenyun and Chen Xue, who were old-fashioned or casual, must be inclined to be "macro-control factions".

Only Fatty Luo and Gao Dasong, two judges, probably have to play with, saying that they usually claim to be "liberal intellectuals".

"This kind of argument is too uncreative. It is completely logical sophistry. It lacks factual support. You can take jujube pills." The host Sabining observed the changes in the audience's applause and thought to himself that the people who were not optimistic about the division brigade in the venue were probably already accounted for the majority.

Unfortunately, when everyone began to stand in the team, Nan Xiaoniao's opening statement was only more than half of it.

In the last minute of the opposition's opening, Nan Xiaoniao's tone changed, from seeking stability to building a bottom at the beginning, it suddenly turned into a high-profile strange peak and suddenly attacked.

"...In addition, when making a statement, the other party's debater said that privacy is the product of human beings' consistent pursuit of freedom and a manifestation of human struggle for freedom. The other party only gave this judgment, but did not give a basis for this judgment, and seemed to think that this was self-evident.

In this regard, we have to say: humans do have the freedom to pursue privacy, but the pursuit of privacy is not a manifestation of human pursuit of freedom. This description cannot be mutually causal. In other words, in the long river of human history development, did humans always think about pursuing privacy? Privacy is just a pursuit that began to highlight when human society develops from acquaintances to large-scale cooperation between strangers in the industrial era.

Before this, humans might be able to pursue privacy, but no one would care about this issue. Therefore, privacy is one of the values ​​that humans pursue forever. This judgment itself is to look at the sky in a well and the Sichuan dog barks on the sun.

Finally, we emphasize again: Today's debate topic is that humans do not need to limit the development of the Internet to protect privacy. This cannot be equated with 'human beings to actively destroy privacy'. It is different from stipulating it and doing it on its own initiative. Therefore, without restricting the development of the Internet, it cannot be stigmatized as 'destruction of privacy'. It just feels that the increasingly marginalized right of privacy is not worth betting on more social resources and costs. Thank you."

"She...what did she mean?" The pro-party debater Liang Chunri was rushing to complain, and was speechless.

Gu Heren is better than his teammates, and he couldn't help but think: "Not restricting the development of the Internet does not mean destroying privacy... This point is easy to refute. However, what is the matter that she just said, "Humans have never always valued privacy."? In a while, you have to focus on the key points when discussing freely. It is difficult to attack when the second debater speaks..."

Guided by this idea, the two sides began cross-debate cautiously.

...

A few minutes later, the verbal and verbal force was connected.

Gu Heren had already been filled with anger, and said first: "Is it obvious to ask the other debater, you always say that human pursuit of privacy cannot be regarded as a representation of human pursuit of freedom, and that privacy is not something that humans have always wanted to pursue. Is there any basis for this statement? In our opinion, the more progress humans progress, the more they pay attention to privacy and personal freedom, isn't this obvious! Your point of view is too ridiculous!"

When he asked the question, he did not name anyone who pointed at the opposite side to answer, but Feng Jianxiong immediately stood up.

"Of course there is a basis - in the feudal era, human beings had the right to define the right of 'privacy'? Of course, there was no such concept at that time. The emergence of privacy was not even an early product of capital attention to legislation, but a product that was not produced by capital attention to development to a considerable maturity stage. According to the research of the Oxford Law Dictionary, this concept did not appear until 1890 - it was more than 20 years since the Second Industrial Revolution and electrification, which shows that there was no concept of privacy in ancient times..."

Feng Jianxiong said this, but he wasn't finished yet, and he didn't sit back. But Gu Heren couldn't wait to interrupt him and interrupted:

"Doesn't that just show that privacy rights are the product of human progress? As we all know, when the granaries are full, etiquette is known, when food is enough, honor and disgrace are known, and when full and warm, we think about it. There was no right to privacy in ancient times, because in that era, human beings were not even satisfied with the basic needs of material and spiritual civilization, so they did not have time to consider privacy rights. Once satisfied, the pursuit of privacy will be more prominent. The material and spiritual supply of future society will naturally become richer, so shouldn't human beings pursue privacy more!"

"Well said it!" The majority of Fudan students in the venue cheered in a low voice, cheering for Gu Heren's righteous remarks.

"The reason is good, but interrupting the conversation is a bit of a loss of temperament. And if the opponent's attack point is not as expected by the party, such interruption will be very loss of points." Fatty Luo and Gao Dasong thought so.

The other judges did not comment.

Everyone is watching the changes and looking forward to whether Feng Jianxiong can give a strong rebuttal.

Feng saw that Xiong was very decent and could not see the shame and anger when he was interrupted. It was not until Gu Heren stopped talking and the host cut his face, and he spoke proudly: "Is it finished? Is there any evidence?"

"What... what evidence?" Gu Heren was a little puzzled. Fortunately, he reacted quickly. "I'm talking about common sense and universal truth, just as well as the sun rises and sets in the east. What evidence do you need? If you throw a piece of meat on the ground, will the dog rush straight over and pick it up or turn a corner and then pick it up? "The line between two points is the shortest. Even dogs know this truth. Do you still need evidence?"

"Haha, is it public knowledge, not self-proclaimed?" Feng Jianxiong was not angry at all. "Just just now, the other debater asked me to prove that 'privacy is not a pursuit that humans always have.' I took out the "Oxford Law Dictionary" as evidence.

Now you have refuted me, I want you to prove what you said, "The material spirit is richer, and you will pursue privacy more." But you refuse to provide evidence. Even from the principle of "who claims, whoever provides evidence", it is not reasonable, right? But it doesn't matter, I just think you can't prove it-"

Feng Jianxiong said this and turned his body and no longer looked at Gu Heren, but turned to the stands and talked freely.

Gu Heren wanted to interrupt again, but he didn't know what to say for a moment, so he missed another rude opportunity.

"Dear judges, hosts, audiences. I have just proved that humans only noticed the concept of "privacy" for the first time when the Second Industrial Revolution was underway for more than 20 years. It can be seen that privacy rights have not existed since ancient times, nor have they been needed since ancient times.

In the simple folk customs of the country protecting the farming society, and even in the early days of capital paying attention to industrialization, why do humans do not need privacy? In fact, this is because the production relations of human society have not yet entered an era with large social division of labor as the mainstream.

Therefore, in the traditional acquaintance society where "head down and not look up" does not have the problem of privacy. Everyone knows the shortcomings of the Zhang family and the Li family. Everyone is familiar with the people around them. No one thinks that "what dishes did I eat today, what luxury goods did I use, how much money did my family have?" These information that reveals personal wealth and status, and social abilities cannot be spoken to.
Chapter completed!