"I...we don't admit it! Maybe what you said in the previous few points is right, but this 'smartphone' brings about the weakening of human free will, which is simply nonsense!"

"Who said that 'Hidden the health of users' and 'attention, self-control decline, addiction' issues are also unique hazards for smartphones? This is obviously wrong! When I use a computer to play World of Warcraft, I will also be addicted. The harm to self-control and concentration is definitely no less than using a smartphone in the future! Besides, how can the little bit of games on the mobile phone be fun on the computer? Even according to the scope of 'harm that only smartphones have' designated by the opponent', these are definitely not counted!"

The four members of the Jinling University team were fighting one after another, and they carried out their final resistance.

Even the words "I will be addicted to playing World of Warcraft myself, and I should be powered. I have already had a low willpower before using my smartphone and I can't concentrate."

If the audience was not present, or even though they were present, but were distracted in the first half, listened to these words alone out of context; then it would be not unfair to imagine some of the debaters of the Jinling team as "someone who is addicted to the Internet should be electrocuted".

Being able to say such words shows that the Jinling team is already in vain and is completely led by the other party. They can only resist one by one, and they are very particular about it, in order to exchange for a situation where "this cannot be considered a unique disadvantage of smartphones."

If it weren't for the opponent's signature to be too bad and people would be disgusted with losing to them, Jinling University had surrendered at this moment - for example, if today was the final and the opponent met Fudan, then when it comes to this, passive resistance would not be embarrassing.

Helplessly, the opposite side is the Normal University, which makes people have to endure the dignity.

"We are the top five prestigious schools in the country! If we lose to the 211 pheasant who may not be able to rank in the top 50 in the country, how can we still be in the Jinling academic community in the future?! We must stand it to the end!"

This is their inner portrayal of the moment.

Unfortunately, this resistance only made this game more confrontational and ornamental, and did not play any other role.

Each point was captured by Feng Jianxiong. Finally, in the summary stage, it completely gathered from the stream into the river and sea, and could not control it.

...

It's finally time to summarize the statement.

Yu Meiqin, who combines beauty and wisdom, stood up gracefully and took out the outline that she had tried and optimized on the spot, and her demeanor was promoted layer by layer.

Her heart has never been as quiet as it is now.

"…To sum up, we say that smartphones bring so many of the above disadvantages, and these disadvantages are unique to smartphones. Traditional mobile phones, PC computers and other electronic products that are currently available in the future, either in terms of mode or to a degree, are not as bad as smartphones in terms of these harms.

At the same time, in the previous competition, we were also very happy to see the opponent's debater reaching a consensus with us on the unique disadvantages of smartphones such as battery safety, privacy leakage, social waste, and environmental pollution.

Therefore, in the end, I will focus on the unique disadvantages of smartphones that the other party has always felt that they have doubts.

First of all, the new generation of smartphones represented by iPhones are harmful to users' personal health and psychological qualities.

The opponent's debaters have always emphasized that computers can also become addicted, and long-term use of computers and traditional mobile phones can also harm health, so they insist that this cannot be considered a "unique harm to smartphones and unprecedented".

However, they did not see that when using computers, users generally need to sit upright and use them in a sitting position. However, the emergence of smartphones has uniquely expanded various entertainment and leisure scenes to lying on the bed and spreading on the sofa. It can be foreseen that scoliosis, periarthritis and other skeletal diseases caused by using smartphones will inevitably be countless in the future.

And as we all know, since we were in elementary school, we knew that lying down to see things will cause serious damage to people's vision. This so-called "convenience" of smartphones is actually to stimulate the last bit of laziness in human nature, but it makes people short-sighted and consumerism, thus paying a healthy price.

A good product must have a sense of social responsibility, and cannot lure users to extremely indulge in their desires for money. There is still a clear distinction between "convenience" and "harmonious) desires, and there is still a standard for the intervention of public order and good customs. That standard is whether it is tempting to damage the health of users and the soundness of other abilities. Otherwise, wouldn't poisons be considered as the category of "society has such needs, why should we interfere"?

Secondly, we talked about the damage to human self-control and free will by smartphones. Maybe everyone has never thought of a problem: when a minor who lacks self-control and is not yet mature in his mind plays games on a computer, his concealment is relatively low, and parents can also guide his children to the right path. Once a minor plays games on a smartphone, the probability of being monitored is greatly reduced. He can even play games casually in the library or study room in the future, and completely degenerate into a useless person.

Then, traditional computers and mobile phones have input devices such as keyboards with mechanical structures, while smartphones have full screens. Especially unscrupulous companies represented by iPhones, in order to pursue the vertical (harmonious) desire of aesthetics, they guide the society to "no buttons are beautiful", leaving only one home button and the rest are all touch-sensitive.

There is no problem with the touch itself. If it is a large screen device, the key position can be fixed. However, the size of the mobile phone device is flawed, which forces the display area to be only that large. At this time, if you still input the fixed key position, it will be inconvenient to press, cannot see clearly, or need to drag frequently. What is the method for smart phones such as iPhone to solve this problem? It is to readjust the key position and make it irregular, and the page can generally be scaled.

Don’t underestimate this design. Over time, the mechanism of human beings developing the “first generate independent needs, then type the keyboard to enter their own needs, and wait for screen feedback” that humans develop from the traditional computer and mobile phone era will be replaced by “I don’t know what I want, look at the screen first, and choose one from the things that can be pressed or selected on the screen.”

This is very terrible. Just as Mr. Lu Xun said in his "Getting the Way", it will gradually evolve from "I want to use my brain and get it myself" to "see what foreign garbage is stuffed by foreigners, jumping from it" to "send the sending the Way". People will become more likely to be recommended, and they will lose the free will to think independently.

In addition, the limited display volume of mobile phone screens will inevitably lead to a narrow contradiction in the future after the content is extremely rich. Users will rely more on mainstream and vulgar. In the end, all people with unstable will may be guided by Qiao Bushi and become a slave to consumerism (harmonious) desire.

After saying so much, some judges may occasionally have an illusion that they think that we are anti-tech, anti-progress, and anti-convenience - this is really a misunderstanding. Because what we are against is never technology, progress, or convenience. We are welcome to the extra convenience that smartphones can bring.

We just say that humans should wait for all aspects of electronic hardware technology to complete some of the technical shortcomings, and then try a new generation of personal terminals, instead of taking out the form of smartphones, which will first lure people into consumerism.

For example, we can wait for battery technology to develop for a few years, flash crash fast crash wireless charging, or a multiple leap in energy storage density.

For example, we can wait for low-energy projection technology, or even improve 3D stereoscopic projection technology, or seek the maturity of VR panoramic retina display technology. Let the content displayed by intelligent push be greatly enriched, instead of just staring at a screen that covers only a few tenths of the area of ​​human binocular vision, displaying a few pitiful "most mainstream and popular" content.

For example, we can wait for the advancement of motion capture technology including corresponding sensors, or wait for the maturity of speech recognition input. Let us guide future personal hardware through human language to perform corresponding operations, or volley the virtual keyboard projected out of thin air without looking at the keyboard or blindly typing, let the motion capture sensor capture human hands to recognize what words they typed—

All of this can help humans avoid the harm of human free will, self-control, privacy and health while reaping the convenience of technological progress. Therefore, in summary, we believe that the emergence of smartphones is really harmful than good, thank you!”

"Huahuhu..." The long-lasting applause did not require dubbing at all. All the audience and judges were completely impressed.

The big hats such as "anti-intellectual" and "anti-technology" should have been powerful weapons of the Jinling University team, but they were "changed" like a god by the opponent, and they used their own way to do so.

Even opposing a new technology product can be so free and easy.

CCTV's cameraman followed Yu Meiqin's ups and downs throughout the whole process, as if even the camera had a breathing soul.

"It's so exciting. I guess the Zheng Fang is completely out of the way. The most exciting game this year is not comparable to those in the past." Yu Qiuyu and Fatty Luo thought so.

Because the Zhengfang started the game first and then summarized it, after Yu Meiqin finished speaking, the Zhengfang's Tennessee had to talk for another four minutes. Unfortunately, no one felt that the game would still have suspense.

However, for the dignity of the former world runner-up and the top five prestigious schools in China, Tennessee must fight until the last moment.

From this perspective, Jinling University is worthy of being the strongest opponent Feng Jianxiong has encountered so far.

In the final summary statement, Tennessee did not use those cliches to resist negatively. After whispering with her main teammate Meng Dana on the spot, she came up with some new views to resist step by step.

For example, the following passage:

"Marcos once said, 'When the market creates a demand, it can promote technological progress more than ten universities', so any scientific development cannot be a castle in the air. Without smartphones, how could humans discover the unique disadvantages of these smartphones during trial and error, and thus avoid these problems in the next generation of personal smart hardware in the future?

Therefore, all the disadvantages are still temporary and problems in the development process. The opponent's debaters repeatedly use mechanical and deadly views to see a developmental problem that should be treated with Marcos, which is a metaphysical mistake in itself.

Therefore, we believe that all the technological progress, experience accumulation and demand motivation brought by human beings in the process of developing and trial and error in smartphones are part of the "profits" brought by smartphones and cannot be separated. We cannot deny the valuable accumulation of trial and error in human experience because human beings can change the "disadvantages" of smartphones in the future..."

"So, we insist that all these 'pros and's rise to smartphones is obviously 'pros and disadvantages' for all human society!"

After saying this summary, Jinling University is worthy of its signature and dignity.

Although, I can only make some empty and unemploymental shouts in the summary statement, and the proof is no longer enough to save the overall situation.

As it turns out, the audience and judges asked questions after the game.

The value of this view is also broken by the question of "If all the experience accumulated after trial and error and the benefits of progress can be attributed to trial and error. Then aren't those patients who are poisoned by new drugs that have entered clinical trials killed the patient to death?"

Indeed, making mistakes can accumulate experience, but experience does not necessarily only rely on making mistakes to solve. Otherwise, why do humans still need so much risk control and learning? Let’s try and make mistakes one by one.

The overall situation has been decided.

After five minutes of intense comments, Yu Qiuyu made a brief comment on behalf of the jury, which also mentioned the above sophistry and believed that this was one of the important points lost by the Jinling University team. Of course, more comments were almost praised for the accuracy and exquisiteness of the tactical entry point of the division team.

"... In short, this is the most exciting game I have seen this year. Sometimes I even think that if this Normal University team is qualified to participate in the Group B final of Sing Tao last year, they will definitely win the championship - of course, it's just a joke. Now, on behalf of the jury, I will submit the results of the evaluation to the host, and the host will ask the host to officially announce the results of the competition."

After saying that, Yu Qiuyu handed an envelope and his hands to the host of CCTV.

"Now I announce: The best debater in this game is the second debater of the opposition, Feng Jianxiong!"
Chapter completed!