On the same night, at half past eight.

Undercurrents outside the field were surging, and Feng Jianxiong's popularity and number of blog fans surged wildly under the influence of TV shows and word-of-mouth.

In the auditorium of Jinling University, Feng Jianxiong was still calm and quarreling with his opponent.

Because news from the outside of the field could not be transmitted, the opponents who fought at home had not yet had time to fully realize the enemy's strength.

As mentioned earlier, tonight's debate topic is "Is the emergence of smartphones more beneficial than disadvantages or disadvantages more beneficial?" It seems to be relatively open and there is more room for maneuvering.

The degree of unfairness between the pros and cons of the debate topic is also slightly lighter than the "whether the progress of mobile phone technology is more beneficial than the disadvantages or the disadvantages are more beneficial than the advantages" in the Group B final of last year's International College Debate Competition.

But in general, the Zhengfang is still a bit of an inherent advantage - after all, in the eyes of the audience and judges, every technological progress is always more likely to outweigh the disadvantages.

This further encouraged the preset psychological advantages of the Jinling University team.

Tonight's Jinling University team consists of two men and two women, and the proportion of the match is similar to Feng Jianxiong. When Jinling University won the world runner-up in 1990, it was sent to a group of 4 pure girls, which shows that the style of Jin University has always focused on using girls.

However, when there are many girls, the technical characteristics will inevitably tend to be "planned debate". That is, typhoons, tone, body language, and rhythm are all mastered to a very good level. However, once the debate plan is disrupted by the enemy, it will be a little stiff in adapting to the leaks. It will even avoid problems and repeatedly emphasize it.

This is not a discrimination against girls, it is just that Kim Da’s style of training and picking people.

"Is this the university that has won the second place in the world? I finally met the first world-class strong enemy." Before we began to make a statement, except for Feng Jianxiong, the other three girls at Jinling Normal University were so excited at this moment.

Although the other party only won the world runner-up more than ten years ago, and now his strength is only the top five in China. However, being able to have the opportunity to beat a world-class opponent, even if it is out of date, is ultimately exciting.

As everyone was thinking, the Jinling team debated Qiao Zhiya had already stood up slowly and started the opening statement.

Qiao Zhiya is still very confident in her heart.

"Dear host, judge, and audience, hello everyone... As we all know, the emergence of smartphones has made human life more and more convenient, and the content media more and more abundant..."

"…The emergence of smartphones has also made communication between humans more closely, convenient and instantly. It makes space, distance and time no longer an obstacle to human communication..."

"... Finally, smartphones have also promoted the implementation of a large number of basic applied scientific research, promoting the deepening of "integration of industry, education and research", allowing more science and technology in laboratories to obtain realistic business scenarios, and further promoting social employment, scientific and technological progress, and industrial development..."

Three minutes, one second is not more than one second, the tone is ups and downs, the rhythm is relaxed and relaxed, and everything is just right. The overall argument is basically no different from last year's international competition. The skeleton context is very similar, but the rhetoric and examples have been changed.

The only thing that is not enough is that the enemy's "preventive argument definition is not very strict" - that is, because there are no reborn people in the Jinling team, it is impossible to accurately "predict" how Feng Jianxiong would let Nan Xiaoniao define the trap in the argument.

Of course, if it is not strict or not, this is still an attempt.

Qiao Zhiya’s “preventive leak plugging” says: “In addition, some people may say that the emergence of mobile phones will reduce face-to-face communication, indulge in human feelings, and excessive use of mobile phones will bring various occupational diseases and physical damage. But we must point out that this is just caused by the lack of development of mobile phone technology at present.

In the future, with the advancement of sensor technology, the improvement of push mechanism, and the iteration of ergonomic design and display technology, we can completely solve these flaws. Therefore, the emergence of smartphones will definitely outweigh the disadvantages.”

All the judges and audiences of experts can clearly find that this statement is mainly based on the experience of reviewing last year's international competition, and refuted in advance that "the appearance of smartphones reduces face-to-face communication, makes the world more indifferent, and makes everyone less focused" points - because this was the refutation when the Beijing Language Institute lost to the Korean Foreign Languages ​​University last year. So the Jinling team obviously speculated today that the division team would also attack at this point.

"Although it's a bit conservative, stable, and not very ornamental, it's finally a fairly orderly. It's like a familiar routine."

Some of the five judges in the venue nodded slightly, while others showed thoughts. Some of them had high requirements and were particularly picky, and they only frowned and asked for mistakes.

At this stage of the competition, those who can serve as judges are basically well-known cultural figures in society, such as Professor Wang, a famous Chinese teacher from Beijing Foreign Studies University, a domestic poet Yu Qiuyu, and a CCTV language program director Luo Pangzi, etc.

...

"Don't be nervous, the debate team at Jinling University has already passed its peak period. They have done better in terms of accuracy and are not afraid of creativity."

On the side of the division team, Nan Xiaoniao silently recited Feng Jianxiong's words of comfort before the game, glanced at the outline he had just modified, took a deep breath, and stood up.

"...Hello everyone, before expressing our views, I would like to say a few shameful words first. After hearing the opening statements of the opponent's debater just now, I couldn't help but have an illusion that we had prepared the wrong topic today. Later, I looked at the subtitles on the electronic screen several times before I was sure that I had made it wrong.

What are we going to argue today? Is it ‘whether the emergence of smartphones have more advantages than disadvantages or disadvantages than advantages’, so the pros and cons of this ‘movement of mobile phone technology’ has nothing to do with it!

Of course we know that mobile phones are a good thing. They facilitate communication, deepen communication, promote the economy, and promote the application of technology. We also know that the advancement of mobile phone technology can definitely make these conveniences and promote deeper - but! All the benefits of all these are the benefits brought by the progress of the mobile phone itself! It has nothing to do with whether the mobile phone is "smart"!

Therefore, please don’t forcefully gild the “smartphone” to “smartphone” with the benefits that are not smartphones already exist, or the ‘common’ benefits that all mobile phones have!

Therefore, we believe that to discuss today's debate topic, we must first strictly define and define the "smartphone".

As we all know, the concept of "smartphone" has appeared in the world. It is a small group of American electronic product companies on the other side of the ocean. For example, Apple has also taken out display machines, to be precise, it is an iPhone.

Therefore, we believe that the scope of discussion in today's debate topic should refer to the "smartphone" that meets the definition of product technology such as iPhone and other products. Compared with traditional mobile phones, is the advantage of this part of the differentiated technology greater than the disadvantage or the disadvantage of the advantage?

And it is simplistic to be equivalent to ‘Is future mobile phones more beneficial than harmful or harmful than beneficial’. ‘Smartphones’ are just an attempted product that has emerged in the present generation and is not qualified to be equivalent to ‘future mobile phones’. Perhaps in the near future, people will find that this generation of products is just a failed trial and error of human needs, and it is not known that they are soon crushed by the wheel of history rolling forward…”

The opening remark of a total of five or six hundred words was prepared, and even though Nan Xiaoniao had already been prepared, it took a minute to speed up his speech.

In other words, the division team only has 2 minutes to express their own information, and the first minute is entirely used to ridicule and limit the opponent.

Fortunately, when Feng Jianxiong discussed with his teammates, he noticed the importance of the first part, so he compressed the later stuff, and the time was almost enough.

The judges' listless expressions at the beginning were finally activated, and they looked at each other inquiring eyes, as if they felt that the scene had become Intristin.

"If you have an idea, it seems that in the definition battle, Normal University has been more motivated than Jinling. It has forced the topic to be narrowed from the PK between the 'existing mobile phone and the future mobile phone' to the pros and cons of the 'existing mobile phone and the iPhone'. Only in this way can the debate be played out!" Professor Wang thought to himself.

"In this way, as long as the iPhone and its imitation are proven to be dead garbage, there will be hope for the competition." Fatty Luo's mouth showed a playful Intristin expression.

Of course, such topic separation techniques can inevitably have a counterproductive effect in certain specific situations. For example, a judge of a female writer named Chen showed disdain and said to himself: "You can also blacken the iPhone with such a beautiful full-screen phone? I bought one as soon as possible after I came out!"

As a woman, she is born with a bit of facial control attributes. She always thinks that being good-looking is the best way to do mobile phones, and the function is not important. After watching Qiao Gou’s press conference, she thought the iPhone was good, so she had no good impression of the division team after her preconceived ideas.

Any advantages and disadvantages are inevitable.

In the atmosphere of anticipation, Nan Xiaoniao successfully finished the opening statements of the subsequent part. The general content is nothing more than the following points:

"... So, we have never said that mobile phone technology has made bad progress, nor have we said that before the advent of smartphones, due to the limitations of mobile phone functions, mobile phones generally had low energy consumption, high service life and stability, so the updates were slower, and the frequency of environmental pressures such as electronic waste was also lower.

After the emergence of full-screen smartphones represented by iPhone, on the one hand, we can fully predict that due to the explosion of its functions and the number of software supported, the mobile CPU, memory and various hardware indicators will inevitably fall behind quickly after the launch of the mobile phone. Therefore, those who changed a mobile phone for three or five years will be forced to change a mobile phone for two years, or even a year. This invisibly caused huge social waste and environmental pollution caused by electronic waste.

On the other hand, it is well known that smart phones with full-screen and high-processing power chips far exceed traditional mobile phones in terms of energy consumption, and in fact, they exceed the physical bottlenecks of battery technology at this stage, forming shortcomings. The basic science of human beings in the field of battery technology cannot make a breakthrough in the past few years of smartphones. Therefore, if we want to force smartphones in this era, it will inevitably lead to battery madness, expand the limit, and approach the critical point of security.

We can completely foresee that the future battery explosion of smartphones and the spontaneous combustion of charging/use will definitely rise significantly compared to traditional mobile phones, posing a threat to the personal and property safety of users. These are all disadvantages caused by the forced leap in the form of ‘smartphones’ when the supporting physical hardware technology does not keep up.

In addition, according to corresponding psychological research, the emergence of smartphones in full-screen form will further aggravate human addiction and dependence on mobile phones, and reduce human free will practice ability and self-control. These are all social harms brought by smartphones..."

——

ps: The above is already three thousand words, so the next paragraph is reduced as much as possible to ensure that the total number is less than 4,000 words.

This passage was originally intended to be written into the author's words, but it could not be written down.

After yesterday's chapter, a "straight woman" sent a private message and started to squirt: I used the "virgin" issue in yesterday's plot to illustrate the "occasional mistakes/breaking down" problem, which is an insult to women.

I can only tell everyone here:

First of all, I have never said that girls should be despised/treated differently if they are not virgins before marriage (think about it a little bit, and take a step back, even if I really have a virgin complex in my heart, with my level of speaking without missing a trace, will I make such a low-level mistake of giving people a hand?)

So, yesterday's passage is just for example. Just use it, and anyone with a discerning eye can understand the logic behind it. It is just an emphasis on "don't use black and white high-voltage lines to judge a person", and there must be more humane statistical dimensions and look at people with flesh and blood.

So, regarding premarital sex, it is well known that this is an era of increasingly free freedom and should not hinder everyone's freedom.

If I had to express my personal opinion, I think it would be "open and honest, living out my true self".

If you like to play more, you can play more. If you like to play more, you can be more traditional. Everyone will not interfere with each other and be brave enough to express themselves.

The only despicable person is probably just a person who deceives and betrays his own views.
Chapter completed!