"Sexual Order"

Because of the lack of the original, one part after another is pulled in and "filled". These filled things themselves are also missing, but because they are different from the lack of the original.

The ability of cognition becomes clear and powerful in the continuous stacking.

However, this cognitive ability is actually built on the outermost layer in reverse.

Through various information observed by the outside world, we find correspondences in our own "experience" and "memory".

From this point of view, people's cognitive structure is reversed.

If we have to find a "ontology", then the outermost layer, the "outermost layer cognition" stacked from the underlying structures that do not know the specific number, may be the "ontology".

However, the way this ontology is to trace inwardly.

In fact, you regard what you observe as a cognitive prototype and look for the corresponding one inward.

But the underlying logic of the cognitive structure is the original "impulse" looking for a correspondence, to correspond to what one is “missed” and “needed”.

Therefore, it is often easy to cause cognitive dislocation.

And the ones that are most often and first to recognize are often themselves.

The cognition stacked with the original impulse also has the lack of "self".

Therefore, people will look for various "labels" to fill their own voids.

"Male", "Female", "Strong", "Healthy", "Words and feet", "Skin color", "Tall and Short", "Fat and Thin"...

The differences in various physical characteristics are the most distinguishable by visual organs.

In this case, the characteristics that will change and the stages experienced in life will become the material to find corresponding materials in the cognitive structure.

This process does not begin after a person has enough "intellectual ability".

Instead, it begins at the moment when you have "consciousness" and "cognitive activities".

Moreover, it is not the cognitive ability of the "brain" in theory.

But the body, body.

The description of "cognitive" ability here is closer to the level of "feeling" and "feedback".

When a baby is one with his mother, the two are physiologically connected to each other.

At this stage, in terms of physiological feelings, the baby will "think" that he and his mother are "unified".

If you have to simplify it, you can only describe it as "the same creature" and "the same subject".

At this stage, the formation of "self-loss correspondence" has gradually been completed in the formation of infant physiological and cognitive structure.

It is what I said before, "Fill all kinds of things into the missing holes", layer by layer.

However, in addition to the original vacancy that could not be filled and a series of non-real correspondences, another new vacancy has emerged.

After being born, the baby and the mother are separated.

This also means that the external entity "corresponding to self-loss" is disconnected from itself.

A new, huge cleft, a cognitive cleft from the outside to the inside was torn out.

As the process of gradual growth, this cognitive crack will be constantly filled.

What exactly is filled in depends on the environment and self.

However, the process of filling the missing is still the same.

However, people have already begun to accept external information at this time, and they are no longer simply stacking internal impulses on each other.

From this stage, when explaining the situation of "filling the void and filling the gap", if ordinary people can understand it, it is -

"I want to be complete"

Then, the question arises.

"What am I? Who am I?"

When you begin to define and judge various labels for yourself, gradually begin to be specific, take the characteristics of external things as the prototype, and structure your own recognition, "I want to become complete", and you will gradually be projected into various shapes.

Self-identity is "I am a male".

Then the complex and comprehensive integrated driving force of "I want to become complete" will follow this to drive consciousness and the whole, and find a "way for men to become complete."

However, the problem is that human external cognition can be changed.

Moreover, the most important thing is "language".

What do you use as a mapping of concepts and as a tool of thinking?

For example, if a computer wants to display a picture, the relatively shallower "kernel" is a series of code.

To go deeper, these codes can be disassembled into "electrical signals".

However, on the "display interface", the file name of this image is "Man".

Whether it is this file name or the series of code, it is part of the symbology.

However, symbolic systems are often developed from external objects.

People's cognitive structures cannot recognize the details of their own cognitive construction process. Coupled with the misalignment between the cognitive corresponding process from the outside to the inside and the cognitive process from the inside to the outside, this symbolic system must have errors and cannot be "completely expressed".

Therefore, "continuous correction" is needed.

In the process of language building cognition as symbols, the original and internal information transmission form also collapsed.

People constantly fill in the gaps with language as cognitive material.

It can be said that in the process of language learning and being able to communicate with the outside world, a "new consciousness" built with "language" as a cognitive element emerged.

This "new consciousness" constructed by language as an element is "consistent" from the perspective of self-thinking.

"I am me."

Therefore, some theories believe that when a baby opens his eyes, or even earlier, when he can hear external information in the mother's abdomen, he has "killed" his original self.

Or "locking the original self in the cage of language symbols."

However, the driving force of this cognitive process, cognition, thinking, and body impulse is still there.

However, according to Yao Yan's idea, it is better to say that "the group of self-detained in the cage of language symbols."

The "number" of the self, or the number of layers, is too many, and there are as many vacancies as there are.

This chapter is not over, please click on the next page to continue reading! However, this kind of "self" may be described by "demand" and "desire".

But it's just "more".

The "new self" constructed by this linguistic symbol does not really imprison the original self.

It is still being affected by the body's "original motivation".

The "finding correspondence" in cognitive structure continues.

Find the corresponding vacancy from language, symbols, and things observed from the outside world.

Because language systems replace cognitive architectures, many people are prone to confuse "biological sex" and "semiotic sex".

All use "sex" as a description.

"Sex" at this level is not "Gender" in the true sense.

It was just looking for two targets to match the "driven force" and "vacancies".

This target uses "male and female" as a reference.

According to different self-cognition, if a person says he is a "male", then the "woman" can be a noble ideal, a certain act of destruction, or a food.

This is from the perspective of occurrence.

"I want to be complete" and "I want to fill the vacancy".

“To be satisfied”

What can make oneself "satisfied" is then what is "partner".

Another reference object can be another label for a person.

Within the scope of the concept of "people", if you are a "man", then the corresponding vacancy is "women".

Within the scope of the concept of "biology", if you are "human", then the corresponding one is "non-human".

Within a certain "concept scope", cross yourself out, and the rest is the "partner" he pursues.

In this process, all "occupying" behaviors can satisfy the corresponding pursuits brought by this driving force.

However, compared to "eating food", "eating non-human", "occupying things outside of human beings", and "occupying things outside of human beings", the influence of cognitive processes, self-identity and language concepts will be greater.

What you have to say, possessiveness, conquest, and control can all be described in a more one-sided manner.

"I don't, so I need it."

Yao Yan recalled and searched for the memory of this description of cognitive formation.

A theory of view that has some commonalities with Lacan's expression of love.

His eyes also fell on that eyeball.

In the process of forming the spiritual world, what form will the influence of this cognitive construction construct "female"?
Chapter completed!