Listing comments

It's time to go on the shelves again.

Speaking of this book, there are many situations.

At first I thought the editor was another person I had added, but later I realized that it was not. I only added the editor’s book for more than a month after I opened the book, so there should be no one.

Well, although the setting is the spiritual world, there are many things that cannot be written.

After all, I am still an individual.

I also cannot confirm which thoughts I have been caused or changed by my body.

The initial opportunity of this book is probably because of its serious personality?

Well, you should know how troublesome it is for a person with a real personality.

But being serious about personality is only in some aspects. A person’s personality is not constant. Even if a person is interested in more than one thing, it will change.

For example, when I first wrote about Night Crow, I was just interested in the world after death and would think about what it felt like after death, but at the same time I was more interested in other things.

However, after I went to the hospital last year to find the problem, I became more interested in this problem.

After all, maybe one day it will be the practice of field inspection.

Experience has influenced people. From the beginning when I was writing a book, I had the idea of ​​"Why can you scold me, why can't I retort?" to the ignorance of "You can scold me, just scold me," and there have been many changes.

However, now I think about it, it may be related to the previous discussion in the author group.

An author mentioned how to deal with reader comments.

After all, reader comments will influence the perception of new readers.

I have also happened to myself. Sometimes when I read some books, I choose to read them because they are all good reviews in the comments. But I think they are not good, or if they say they are not good in the comments, I give up not reading them. As a result, I read them one day and forget about the previous one, but I think they are very good.

Now that I think about it, it is probably the influence of the "primary effect".

Ah, I will also write the material "first cause effect". I won't talk about the details now. If you are interested, you can check it yourself. The general meaning is that when a person knows something, his first impression will often affect his subsequent judgment.

It makes people make judgments with preconceived ideas and affects subsequent evaluations.

If it is placed in a novel, comments and posts will also have this impact.

Similarly, it will also affect the author.

This is also what I learned later.

At that time, the authors in the author group basically had the same opinion—

From the plot point of view.

Readers don’t know how you designed your worldview. You only know some information. With the information difference, readers’ understanding of the plot is different from yours.

The most dangerous thing is that the author originally had his own outline, but the reader did not know that under the other party's understanding, he was walking another line and used it as a criterion for judgment.

If the author is influenced by the readers to change the outline and the plot, it is the most dangerous situation.

Of course, there are also situations where readers have better ideas than the author. After all, the author is not omnipotent, but it is inevitable that there are few such situations.

When listening to readers' opinions, it is often because the bad influence is more than the good influence. Your own ideas conflict with the "new ideas", making a mess.

I have a deep understanding of this.

My level is limited and I don’t like to use mature commercial writing scenes, which makes the plot of the books I write become dull.

I still understand what I have, and I will not misunderstand it.

But I was originally willful and had no motivation to change.

This is even more so now. I don’t know when it will be buried. Of course, I will give priority to what I want to write.

Speaking of this, we have to talk about the book itself.

The prototype of the book was found during the Night Crow period. If you are an old book friend, you should be able to see the development context of the material design of "spirit" and "consciousness".

It was initially formed, but it was actually a night crow.

If I remember correctly, it was the thing that I confused Harry Potter's Animagus with Jung's Anima and Animus.

The diverse themes of Night Crow itself involve multiple myths.

Because of Anima, I began to wonder whether there are any false rumors and distortions that I quoted myself, and the myths and legends I have seen?

How much do readers understand when they see these things I write?

However, it is obvious that expression and understanding will make readers make different judgments.

Just like the same myth and the same passage, the two authors understand different connotations, and things created based on it as the prototype are also different.

However, can readers tell how many differences are there?

No, the author can't do it either.

I am the author of Book A. I know how to use this material for Book A, but I don’t know how to use Book B and what its meaning is. After all, I am also a reader to Book B.

And in the face of "myth", the same is true.

I like crows and have a general understanding of all kinds of folk customs, literature, and mythological images derived from crows, but I am not sure what is wrong with my understanding.

From another perspective, bad luck, night, death, and rumors are the main types of image labels of crows.

My initial night crow planned to write all four of these.

But as I wrote, I found that I couldn't get stuck.

If you want to write out everything you want to write in full, Ye Ya can't finish it.

Well, the night crow has become a lifetime now.

There is also the fan of the Tsar.

Although I had thought the protagonist in a certain work had a little Stockholm feeling before, I did not confirm it carefully.

I didn't expect such an accident to happen.

It is precisely because of this reason that I began to wonder why I didn’t find the hidden problems in that work.

What is the mechanism for people to process information?

Can I avoid something by understanding these mechanisms?

And in Silver Crow, the subject is "memory", "death", the self, and the personality.

Regarding the changes in cognition and judgment, and the self-issues.

Now this book is based on "rumor" as its theme.

Apart from these, I have nothing to write about.

Although I want to make money, I can’t change the amount of money I earn, and I don’t know when I will be buried one day, so I don’t plan to change the writing style.

All I can say is...

Thank you to all the book friends who are willing to continue reading for reasons. I will try my best to write what I want to write.

Of course, it is different from whether you want to do it or not.

I also want to be a platinum master, but in fact I just can't do it.

I wrote for two hours of emotion, well... there is only one chapter after 12 o'clock hh.
Chapter completed!