Egypt, which did not betray Nasser's claim, is still the leader of the Arab world. In fact, if Selov said that the changes in Egypt after Nasser's death in history can be regarded as Egypt's version of revisionism. The result is that Egypt's leadership in the Arab world was eventually taken away by Saudi Arabia. As long as Saudi Arabia does not commit suicide, Egypt will basically be unable to take it back.

They are all pro-American countries, and Saudi Arabia has much more wealth than Egypt. Who would choose Egypt as its leader in this situation? Why? With you, there are many people? Ninety-seven percent of Egypt itself is in deserts. Losing its leadership position in the Arab world is very deadly. Egypt without leadership is a poor country with a population explosion and barren land. This cannot be saved by a Suez Canal.

However, for Mubarak, this mediation rejected Saudi forces and it was still not smooth sailing. In Egypt this month, under the blue sky and white clouds, the Sphinx lying quietly prostrates, admiring the various aspects of the world. The Great Pyramid, people riding on camels walked forward safely, looking up at the miracle of a thousand years ago.

Cairo is a city with a very long history, with long-standing pyramids, eternal Nile River, towering Cairo towers, sacred and solemn mosques, all-encompassing museums and elegant and atmospheric opera houses. All of this casts a veil of classical and historical sense for Cairo. During this season, Egypt will welcome countless tourists, including European and American tourists who act alone, as well as tourists from the socialist camp organized by the state.

Compared with a rich man like Saudi Arabia, Egypt naturally cannot be considered wealthy. However, Egypt, which has a political stance that tends to the Soviet Union, does not hate the bourgeoisie's bad money. Egypt also exports labor force to European and American countries. Safety depends on the Soviet Union and the economy depends on Europe and the United States. There are many state-owned committees in this definition, and Egypt is just one of them.

Under this landscape, representatives from Syria, Iraq, Iran, and North and Yemen were warmly welcomed by Mubarak. Cairo, the capital of Egypt, also knew that the country was mediating the conflict between North and South and Yemen. This topic has become a topic of discussion. Of course, people cannot see the interests behind it.

The problems cannot be solved by a word of great unity in the Arab world, and not all countries are composed of Arabs. Iran, which also participates in the mediation, obviously has a good relationship with North Yemen. The influence of the Shiites still has a considerable radiation power in Iran.

As the first socialist country in the Middle East, Iraq also has a majority Shiite population and has very good relations with Iran. Syria is also a military ally valued by the Soviet Union, and no country can be easily dealt with.

According to the definition of a military power, this mediation gathered all military powers in the Middle East, including Egypt. Which country does not have a population of tens of millions, which country does not have a army of hundreds of thousands, and which country does not have a thousand tanks? Which country does not have a country that the Soviet Union values ​​with development potential?

It cannot be said that the Soviet Union has never been optimistic about Egypt's potential, but the Suez Canal is too important.

Syria, Iraq and Iran have different positions. The mediation results are far from optimistic as ordinary people on the streets of Cairo predicted. There will be no less exchange of interests and games. There will be no situation where Egypt waves its big hand and other countries nod their heads. This situation can only occur when Egypt declares war on Israel.

Mubarak has also made some preparations for the upcoming difficulties. Of course, Egypt still gave sufficient courtesy to all countries in propaganda, showing the unity of Arab countries. But Iran is not very convinced...

Iran is the Persian majority. Considering the historical tradition, he has some sympathy for North Yemen. However, North Yemen is pro-US, Iran is pro-Soviet, and Iraq and Iran have a good relationship. In short, the responsibility Mubarak faces is never as simple as it seems, very chaotic and very chaotic...

"Egypt accepted Egypt's initiative and initiated this mediation. Of course, the fundamental reason for Egypt's agreement is that it cannot look at the civil war between the Yemeni brothers. This is Egypt's responsibility as an Arab." Mubarak first took out the Soviet flag. Not all these countries bought Egypt's account. But they are indeed pro-Soviet countries.

Iran and Iraq also used the Soviet system and were considered members of the socialist camp in the broad sense. Syria is an important military ally of the Soviet Union, and of course Egypt itself is also. This is the common point of all participating countries. Seeking common ground while reserving differences is a prerequisite for any negotiation, and Mubarak also understands this very well.

"Iran also agrees with peace in Yemen in the north and south, but the peace plan should be fairer. I believe this is also Egypt's wish!" said the representative of Iran. "We all know that the current situation in Yemen has a lot to do with British imperialism. Not only Yemen, the loss of Bahrain has also caused Iran to suffer huge losses. The same is true for Iraq. I believe that Chairman Mubarak also understands this feeling. Egypt was invaded by Britain and France thirty years ago."

Mubarak nodded. As the strongest country in the world at that time, Britain naturally would not let go of North Africa and the Middle East, which have important status. Many countries here are victims, and today's situation is caused by Britain.

"This is of course our purpose, and Egypt will fully respect Iran's opinions. Of course, Iran just said that the most important thing is fairness." Mubarak took the word fairness very seriously.

The relationship between Egypt and Iran is relatively complicated. Due to political and geographical reasons, the relationship between the two is destined not to be very good. However, if it is an irreconcilable mortal enemy, it is not considered a matter of being. Both countries are allies of the Soviet Union. Moreover, the definitions of the two countries are different. Egypt wants to be the leader of the Arab world. Iran is a Persian country and will not pose an essential threat to Egypt.

Compared with Iran, Egypt focuses more on the potential challenger Saudi Arabia. If this mediation is successful, it will gain Egypt a lot of reputation, which is also a kind of containment for Saudi Arabia, which is increasingly powerful in money.

"Fairness is mutual, and we think there should be no too many tendency positions." The Iraqi representative's speech was somewhat biased towards Iran. Whoever made the Shiites in both countries have great power and had to make some kind of compromise. The time of a generation still cannot resolve the religion that has existed for thousands of years.

The two countries mean that they should not make humiliating accusations against North Yemen and save the face of both sides of the conflict. Of course, this is not an excessive suggestion, but Mubarak still will not agree easily, which is part of the game.

Egypt has a prominent position in the Middle East and the world, and its diplomacy is multi-faceted. Mubarak clearly knows that only by fully leveraging its role as a major power in the Middle East and its unique influence on hot issues in the Middle East can Egypt show its position in the world. It not only makes the Soviet Union understand Egypt's unique role, but also makes the United States see this.

"Historical celebrities do have some skills!" Selov could see that this was Egypt's intentional delay and resolve Iran and Iraq's position. It was not that Egypt liked atheism, Yemen, how much Egypt liked atheism. It was that religious issues forced Egypt to make a choice. This was because the General Secretary could not understand the thoughts of believers. He hated heresy more than atheists.

When Mubarak took over Egypt, he faced a severe and difficult domestic situation. The economy was in a recession, severe inflation, high debt, corruption was prevalent, social security was deteriorating, and violence continued. In just a few years, Egypt seems to have recovered some momentum, and this historical celebrity is still retaliated.

Selov had to wait, and he had something to do, and he provoked the United States repeatedly, and now there were consequences. After all, Reagan was only talking and making trouble. It was not just Yemen, but it was just the first place to happen.

A separatist force appeared on the border between Thailand and Myanmar. This nation believed in Christianity and continued to attack the government forces in Myanmar and Thailand in the local area, pursuing the source. Selov quickly knew that this was a minority force absorbed during the British colonization process. However, now Britain is too busy to take care of itself, and Mrs. Thatcher is still fighting at the All-China Federation of Trade Unions in the UK. It should not be possible. Reagan is the only one with the ability!

The Malaysian military crossed the border to attack Thailand because southern Thailand is the base of the Malaysian Communist Party. Because the Malaysian Communist Party gave the Thai Communist Party aid in the change of Thailand, the Thai government has always turned a blind eye to the activities of the Malaysian Communist Party in southern Thailand. This time, Malaysia crossed the border to attack the Malaysian Communist Party, which also intensified the conflict between the two countries.

Under the command of US advisers, the Philippine government forces cleared the areas occupied by the New People's Army. Just a week after the Communist uprising in Honduras, Central America, and entered the stalemate stage from the 1970s, this was the first time that the Philippine government forces dispatched so many troops to launch a strike against the New People's Army.

In the Horn of East Africa, the situation in Ethiopia is not calm, and the wave of separatism in Eritrea is resurrected, which is what Selov cannot understand the most. Ethiopia's population is fifteen times that of Eritrea, but it has never been able to solve the local separatist forces. Selov doubts whether the Soviet Union was unlucky to support a peanut-like leader.

Almost in the unstable areas of the Soviet Union's global offensive, the wave of anti-Soviet forces suddenly increased. These places are relatively obvious areas. Sudan and Mozambique are not particularly stable, but they can maintain general stability.
Chapter completed!